The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Dark Side of Social Capital
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It has been found that over-embeddedness reduces the flow of new ideas into the group, resulting in parochialism and inertia (Gargiulo and Benassi 1999).”
From The Negative Effects of Social Capital in Organizations: A Review and Extension (2017) · cites this paper as Gargiulo and Benassi 1999
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight
Mair, J., & Martí, I. (2006) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002 · Cited by 4,015
Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/4134367 · Cited by 9,665
The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology
Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(03)00087-4 · Cited by 3,236
Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?
Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. (1999) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/210179 · Cited by 3,038
Self-citationSocioemotional Wealth in Family Firms
Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gómez‐Mejía, L. R. (2012) · Family Business Review · doi:10.1177/0894486511435355 · Cited by 2,822
Metadata
- Authors
- Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M.
- Venue
- Corporate Social Capital and Liability
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 1999
- Pages
- 298-322
- OpenAlex
- W191537309
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 30.37
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Keywords
- social capital, social networks, social liability, strong ties, network composition, organizational adaptability, task environment, managerial networks, corporate social capital, high-tech enterprises
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review