Cited by 10Circadian rhythm and melatoninPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Methodology

Enright, James Thomas·1981·Biological Rhythms

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4615-6552-9_2

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In omission experiments, a circalunar rhythm produced by direct impact will not persist, whereas a clock-mediated circalunar rhythm will persist.

    “Whereas a circalunar rhythm produced by direct impact will not persist under such conditions, a clock-mediated circalunar rhythm will be able to persist.”

    From An Overview of Monthly Rhythms and Clocks (2017) · cites this paper as [21]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Enright, J. T.
Affiliations
Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
Corresponding author
Enright, James Thomas
Venue
Biological Rhythms
Publisher
Springer US
Published
1981
Pages
11-19
OpenAlex
W4240070286
Cited by
10
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
biological rhythms, data collection methods, automated data collection, body temperature measurement, heart rate measurement, urine output

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review