The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What’s the Point? Issues in the Selection of Treatment Objectives
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Children's perceptions of the personal relationships in their social networks.
Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1985) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037//0012-1649.21.6.1016 · Cited by 2,338
Self-citation
Cited by
Age and Sex Differences in Perceptions of Networks of Personal Relationships
Furman, W. C., & Buhrmester, D. (1992) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb03599.x · Cited by 1,645
Self-citationChildren's social and scholastic lives in kindergarten: related spheres of influence?
Ladd, G. W., Birch, S. H., & Buhs, E. S. (1999) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00101 · Cited by 1,136
Children's friendship relations: A meta-analytic review.
Newcomb, A. F., & Bagwell, C. L. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.306 · Cited by 869
Buhrmester, D. (1990) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1130878 · Cited by 845
Ladd, G. W., & Troop-Gordon, W. (2003) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00611 · Cited by 717
Metadata
- Authors
- Furman, W., & Robbins, P.
- Venue
- Children’s Peer Relations: Issues in Assessment and Intervention
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 1985
- Pages
- 41-54
- OpenAlex
- W194283773
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.19
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What’s the Point? Issues in the Selection of Treatment Objectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4684-6325-5_3
- The paper
- Furman, W., & Robbins, P. (1985). What’s the Point? Issues in the Selection of Treatment Objectives. Children’s Peer Relations: Issues in Assessment and Intervention. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6325-5_3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
