Functions of Shoaling Behaviour in Teleosts
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
School formation in pelagic fish has the clear advantage of favouring mate encounters.
“School formation in pelagic fish is typically considered an antipredation (Pitcher, 1986) or a navigational (Couzin et al., 2005) strategy, but it also has the clear advantage of favouring mate encounters.”
From Evolutionary and ecological constraints of fish spawning habitats (2015) · cites this paper as Pitcher, 1986
Cites
Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem
Charnov, E. L. (1976) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x · Cited by 5,374 · see citing works
Hamilton, W. D. (1971) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(71)90189-5 · Cited by 3,506 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Efficient collective swimming by harnessing vortices through deep reinforcement learning
Verma, S., Novati, G., & Koumoutsakos, P. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1800923115 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Evolutionary and ecological constraints of fish spawning habitats
Ciannelli, L., Bailey, K., & Olsen, E. M. (2015) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsu145 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Foraging behaviour and capture success in perch, pikeperch and pike and the effects of prey density
Turesson, H., & Brönmark, C. (2004) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00455.x · Cited by 51 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pitcher, T. J.
- Affiliations
- Bangor University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Pitcher, Tony J.
- Venue
- The Behaviour of Teleost Fishes
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 1986
- Pages
- 294-337
- OpenAlex
- W1593577418
- Cited by
- 962
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.82
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Keywords
- shoaling behaviour, teleosts, predator defense, sustained attention, feeding behaviour, group foraging, predation risk
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
