Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Advances in Cryogenic Engineering

·1971

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4757-0244-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The experimental results of Hawks et al. exhibited excellent agreement with the reported data, validating the accuracy and reliability of the apparatus.

    “The experimental results exhibited excellent agreement with the reported data, thereby validating the accuracy and reliability of the apparatus.”
  • The Hawks et al. system utilized a gallium-doped germanium pyrometer as the radiation detector.

    “utilized a gallium-doped germanium pyrometer as the radiation detector.”
  • Hawks et al. (1971) developed a radiation measurement apparatus based on the radiometric method.

    “In 1971, Hawks et al. [44] at Purdue University developed a radiation measurement apparatus based on the radiometric method.”
  • The pyrometer converted radiation signals from both the sample and the reference blackbody into voltage outputs, from which the sample emissivity was calculated.

    “The pyrometer converted the radiation signals from both the sample and the reference blackbody into voltage outputs, from which the sample emissivity was calculated.”
  • To minimize background interference, all internal chamber walls were coated with a high-emissivity black layer.

    “To minimize background interference, all internal chamber walls were coated with a high-emissivity black layer.”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Publisher
Springer US
Published
1971
Cited by
1
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review