Cited by 63

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Consumer Choice in Historical Archaeology

·1987

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4757-9817-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although individual women who lived at several particular sites were named, the consumer choice framework did not include gender because documentary research had not yet established which gender selected which artifacts of those acquired in the market or as heirlooms or gifts and used by a family or household.

    “Although individual women who lived at several particular sites were named, the consumer choice framework did not include gender because documentary research had not yet established which gender selected which artifacts of those acquired in the market or as heirlooms or gifts and used by a family or household (Spencer-Wood, 1987a;1987b:10).”
  • The consumer choice framework was concerned with relating dynamic interactions among the variables of market access, socioeconomic status, class, race, ethnicity, age, family life cycle, and/or political identities of particular individuals, households or neighborhoods to material differences in lived experiences, including material expressions of power, prestige, domination, competition or status

    “The consumer choice framework was concerned with relating ''dynamic interactions'' among the variables of market access, socioeconomic status, class, race, ethnicity, age, family life cycle, and/or political identities of particular individuals, households or neighborhoods to material differences in lived experiences, including material expressions of power, prestige, domination, competition or”
  • This early inclusive both/and intersectional framework consciously moved away from the previous scientific either/or single-variable methodology, and some chapters found that some individual, household or neighborhood consumer choices were related more closely to family life cycle, household size and structure, ethnic or racial identities than to class.

    “This early inclusive both/and intersectional framework consciously moved away from the previous scientific either/or single-variable methodology, and some chapters found that some individual, household or neighborhood consumer choices were related more closely to family life cycle, household size and structure, ethnic or racial identities than to class (Spencer- Wood, 1987b:11-12).”
  • Spencer-Wood's multivariate framework for analyzing several factors involved in individual and household consumer choices is about the social agency of selecting goods used to express multiple identities, most often described as membership, participation in, or affiliation with, social groups.

    “Indeed, Spencer-Wood's (1987b) multivariate framework for analyzing several factors involved in individual and household consumer choices is about the social agency of selecting goods used to express multiple identities, most often described as membership, participation in, or affiliation with, social groups.”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Publisher
Springer US
Published
1987
Cited by
63
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review