CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2Bioenergy crop production and managementForest Biomass Utilization and ManagementBiofuel production and bioconversion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biomass Feedstock Production and Provision: Overview, Current Status, and Challenges

Shastri, Yogendra, Ting, K. C.·2014·Engineering and Science of Biomass Feedstock Production and Provision
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-8014-4_1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4899-8014-4_1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cultivation, harvesting and transportation costs of the feedstock made up 35 to 50% of the final bioethanol product cost.

    “Research conducted in the bioethanol supply chain also found that the cultivation, harvesting and transportation costs of the fee made up 35 to 50% of the final bioethanol product cost (Shastri and Ting 2014).”

    From Bio-aviation Fuel: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of the Supply Chain Components (2020) · cites this paper as Shastri and Ting 2014

  • Generally beyond the range of 150 to 200 km, transport of biomass is no longer feasible due to high transportation costs.

    “Shastri and Ting (2014) estimated that generally beyond the range of 150 to 200 km, transport of biomass is no longer feasible due to high transportation costs.”

    From Bio-aviation Fuel: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of the Supply Chain Components (2020) · cites this paper as Shastri and Ting 2014

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Goldemberg J (2007) Ethanol for a sustainable energy future. Science 315(5813):808–810 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Perlack RD, Wright LL, Turhollow AF, Graham RL, Stokes BJ, Erbach DC (eds) (2005) Biomass as feedstock for bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. DOE/GO-102005-2135, ORNL/TM-2005/66 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Dale B (2003) ‘Greening’ the chemical industry: research and development priorities for biobased industrial products. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 78:1093–1103 · DOI
  4. Ajanovic A (2011) Biofuels versus food production: does biofuels production increase food prices? Energy 36(4):2070–2076 · DOI
  5. Somerville C, Young H, Taylor C, Davis S, Long S (2010) Feedstocks for lignocellulosic biofuels. Science 329:790–792 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Himmel ME, Ding S, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Brady JW et al (2007) Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 315(5813): 804–807 · DOI
  7. Lange J (2007) Lignocellulose conversion: an introduction to chemistry, process and economics. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 1:39–48 · DOI
  8. Sanchez OJ, Cardona CA (2008) Trends in biotechnological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks. Bioresour Technol 99:5270–5295 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Huber GW, Iborra S, Corma A (2006) Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass: chemistry, catalysts, and engineering. Chem Rev 106(9):4044–4098 · DOI
  10. Jordan N, Boody G, Broussard W, Glover JD, Keeney D, McCown BH et al (2007) Sustainable development of the agricultural bio-economy. Science 316(5831):1570–1571 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Kumar A, Sokhansanj S, Flynn PC (2006) Development of a multicriteria assessment model for ranking biomass feedstock collection and transportation systems. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 129–132:71–87 · DOI
  12. Venturi P, Gigler J, Huisman W (1999) Economic and technical comparison between herbaceous (Miscanthus × Giganteus) and woody energy crops (Salix Viminalis). Renew Energy 16:1023–1026 · DOI
  13. Wang D, Lebauer DS, Dierze MC (2010) A quantitative review comparing the yield of switchgrass in monocultures and mixtures in relation to climate and management factors. GCB Bioenergy 2(1):16–25 · DOI
  14. Jung JY, Lal R (2011) Impacts of nitrogen fertilization on biomass production of switchgrass (Panicum Virgatum L.) and changes in soil organic carbon in Ohio. Geoderma 166(1):145–152 · DOI
  15. Graham RL, Nelson R, Sheehan J, Perlack RD, Wright LL (2007) Current and potential U.S. corn stover supplies. Agron J 99(1):1–11 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Schmer MR, Vogel KP, Mitchell RB, Perrin RK (2008) Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(2):464–469 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Kenney KL, Smith WA, Gresham GL, Westover TL (2013) Understanding biomass feedstock variability. Biofuels 4(1):111–127 · DOI
  18. Kim H, Kim S, Dale B (2009) Biofuels, land use change, and greenhouse gas emissions: some unexplored variables. Environ Sci Technol 43(3):961–967 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shastri, Y., & Ting, K. C.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Shastri, Yogendra
ORCID
Venue
Engineering and Science of Biomass Feedstock Production and Provision
Publisher
Springer New York
Published
2014
Pages
1-15
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4899-8014-4_1
OpenAlex
W181899692
Cited by
2
References
1
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
Keywords
lignocellulosic biomass, energy crops, agricultural residues, perennial grasses, woody biomass, biomass logistics, biomass supply chain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review