The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
Drummond, M. E., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001 · Cited by 13,648
Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making
Wang, J.-J., Jing, Y.-Y., Zhang, C.-F., & Zhao, J.-H. (2009) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021 · Cited by 2,346
Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking
Keeney, R. L. (1992) · Cited by 2,133
Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—A review
Pohekar, S. D., & Ramachandran, M. (2004) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007 · Cited by 1,938
Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making
Kiker, G. A., Bridges, T. S., Varghese, A., Seager, T. P., & Linkov, I. (2005) · Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management · doi:10.1897/ieam_2004a-015.1 · Cited by 914
Mendoza, G. A., & Martins, H. (2006) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.023 · Cited by 819
Decision Analysis: Practice and Promise
Howard, R. A. (1988) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.34.6.679 · Cited by 768
Portfolio Management For New Products
Cooper, R. G., Edgett, S. J., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1998) · University of Maribor digital library (University of Maribor) · Cited by 762
Planning under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach
French, S. (1988) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.1988.181 · Cited by 561
Pareto Ant Colony Optimization: A Metaheuristic Approach to Multiobjective Portfolio Selection
Doerner, K., Gutjahr, W. J., Hartl, R. F., Strauss, C., & Stummer, C. (2004) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1023/b:anor.0000039513.99038.c6 · Cited by 446
Cited by
Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., & Torrisi, G. (2019) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-017-1832-9 · Cited by 1,325
Self-citationTools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job
Voinov, A., Jenni, K., Gray, S., Kolagani, N., Glynn, P. D., Bommel, P., Prell, C., Zellner, M., Paolisso, M., Jordan, R., et al. (2018) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.028 · Cited by 428
Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Matarazzo, B., & Torrisi, G. (2018) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1347612 · Cited by 90
Vita, A., Barlati, S., Ceraso, A., Deste, G., Nibbio, G., & Wykes, T. (2023) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291722000319 · Cited by 74
Raffaeli, R., Lettori, J., Schmidt, J., Peruzzini, M., & Pellicciari, M. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11031210 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Venue
- International Series in Operations Research & Management Science
- Publisher
- Springer New York
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 0884-8289 (ISSN-L)
- 2214-7934
- OpenAlex
- W2499828064
- Cited by
- 1,081
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 37.34
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4
- The paper
- Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. (2016). International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.