Cited by 1,938Multi-Criteria Decision MakingEnergy and Environmental SustainabilityIntegrated Energy Systems Optimization

Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—A review

Pohekar, S.D., Ramachandran, M.·2004·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This approach has been applied in a number of climate change-related fields, including energy and infrastructure planning, industry, land use, and more.

    “This approach has been applied in a number of climate change-related fields, including energy and infrastructure planning [38,325,525,635,732,856], industry [122,334], land use [462,809], and more [127,317,539,761].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [635]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pohekar, S. D., & Ramachandran, M.
Affiliations
Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani (IN)
Corresponding author
Pohekar, S.D.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-08
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
365-381
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965470998
Cited by
1,938
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 89 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 127 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 136 · 2020: 127 · 2019: 137 · 2018: 133 · 2017: 158 · 2016: 138 · 2015: 110 · 2014: 116 · 2013: 101 · 2012: 81
FWCI
25.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy and Environmental Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Keywords
multi-criteria decision making, sustainable energy planning, energy management, analytic hierarchy process, outranking methods, PROMETHEE, ELECTRE, fuzzy methods, decision support system, multi-objective decision making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review