Cited by 82Academic integrity and plagiarismResearch Data Management PracticesAcademic Writing and Publishing

Digital images are data: and should be treated as such

Open access
Cromey, Douglas W.·2012·Methods in Molecular Biology

Abstract

The scientific community has become very concerned about inappropriate image manipulation. In journals that check figures after acceptance, 20-25% of the papers contained at least one figure that did not comply with the journal's instructions to authors. The scientific press continues to report a small, but steady stream of cases of fraudulent image manipulation. Inappropriate image manipulation taints the scientific record, damages trust within science, and degrades science's reputation with the general public. Scientists can learn from historians and photojournalists, who have provided a number of examples of attempts to alter or misrepresent the historical record. Scientists must remember that digital images are numerically sampled data that represent the state of a specific sample when examined with a specific instrument. These data should be carefully managed. Changes made to the original data need to be tracked like the protocols used for other experimental procedures. To avoid pitfalls, unexpected artifacts, and unintentional misrepresentation of the image data, a number of image processing guidelines are offered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-62703-056-4_1

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

6 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [41]Stanleigh S Accessed 16 Sept 2011 Where do we re-draw the line? Ryerson Review of Journalism 1995 Ryerson University School of Journalism Toronto, Canada http://www.rrj.ca/m3693/
  2. [44]National Press Photographer’s Association Accessed 16 Sept 2011 NPPA Calls Newsweek’s Martha Stewart Cover “A Major Ethical Breach” 2005 http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2005/03/newsweek.html
  3. [48]Russ JC Seeing the scientific Image (parts 1-3) Proc R Microsc Soc 2004 39 2 97 114 (113):179-194; (114):267-281
  4. [62]Burger W Burge MJ Histograms Texts in Computer Science: Digital image processing 2008 37 52 Springer London
  5. [71]Committee on Ensuring the Utility and Integrity of Research Data in a Digital Age, National Academy of Sciences Ensuring the integrity, accessibility, and stewardship of research data in the digital age 2009 National Academies Press Washington, DC 25009940
  6. [90]Journal of Cell Biology Accessed 16 Sept 2011 2011 Instructions for Authors http://jcb.rupress.org/site/misc/ifora.xhtml
  7. [91]Nature Accessed 16 Sept 2011 Editorial Policy: Image integrity and standards 2009 http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/image.html

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cromey, D. W.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Cromey, Douglas W.
Venue
Methods in Molecular Biology
Publisher
Humana Press
Published
2012
Volume
931
Pages
1-27
ISSN
  • 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6029
OpenAlex
W2404590792
Cited by
82
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.14
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Methods in molecular biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Arizona Cancer Center
  • University of Arizona (ES006694)
  • National Cancer Institute (P30 CA 23074, CA 23074, P30CA023074)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES-006694, P30ES006694)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
Keywords
image editing, scientific integrity, data provenance, scholarly publishing, data management, image artifacts
MeSH terms
Electronic Data Processing, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Software, Scientific Misconduct, Information Storage and Retrieval, Artifacts, Guidelines as Topic, Peer Review, Research, Information Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review