Cited by 108Software Engineering ResearchSoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies

Knowledge-based approaches in software documentation: A systematic literature review

Ding, Wei, Liang, Peng, Tang, Antony, van Vliet, Hans·2014·Information and Software Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.infsof.2014.01.008

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 78 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ding, W., Liang, P., Tang, A., & van Vliet, H.
Affiliations
  • Wuhan University (CN)
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Liang, Peng
Venue
Information and Software Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
56
Issue
6
Pages
545-567
ISSN
0950-5849 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987352938
Cited by
107
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 6
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Information and Software Technology (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Keywords
knowledge-based approach, software documentation, software architecture documentation, knowledge reuse, information retrieval, knowledge sharing, knowledge reasoning, credibility, brevity, costs and benefits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review