Cited by 32Data Quality and ManagementElectronic Health Records SystemsResearch Data Management Practices

Data Quality in Clinical Research

Nahm, Meredith·2012·Health Informatics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-84882-448-5_10

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Representativeness is a crucial property for secondary use of data in clinical studies or when reusing medical data as training data for ML applications.

    “In particular, representativeness is often not a factor86,87 while it is a crucial property for secondary use of data in clinical studies88 or when reusing medical data as training data for ML applications.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nahm, M.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Nahm, Meredith
Venue
Health Informatics
Published
2012
Pages
175-201
ISSN
1431-1917 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2218029811
Cited by
32
References
75
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.73
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in health care (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Data Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
Keywords
data quality, clinical research data, data collection, data processing, data quality dimensions, data quality framework, clinical research informatics, data management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review