Cyber Hygiene: The Big Picture
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Students at universities are recognised as a particularly vulnerable cohort of users due to a lack of good cyber hygiene practices.
“Students at universities are also subject to ICT policies and are recognised as a particularly vulnerable cohort of users due to a lack of good cyber hygiene practices (Garrison and Posey, 2006;Maennel et al., 2018;Smith, 2018).”
From The influence of ethical principles and policy awareness priming on university students’ judgements about ICT code of conduct compliance (2022) · cites this paper as Maennel et al., 2018
Cites
A behavior model for persuasive design
Fogg, B. (2009) · Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology · doi:10.1145/1541948.1541999 · Cited by 2,328 · see citing works
Weaving Tangled Webs: Offense, Defense, and Deception in Cyberspace
Gartzke, E., & Lindsay, J. R. (2015) · Security Studies · doi:10.1080/09636412.2015.1038188 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Dirt, disgust and disease: a natural history of hygiene
Curtis, V. A. (2007) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2007.062380 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Richards, D., Nazeer Khan, S. B., Formosa, P., & Bankins, S. (2022) · Organizational Cybersecurity Journal: Practice, Process and People · doi:10.1108/ocj-01-2022-0001 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Maennel, K., Mäses, S., & Maennel, O.
- Affiliations
- Tallinn University of Technology (EE)
- Corresponding author
- Maennel, Kaie
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 291-305
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2898885146
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- VMware
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- cyber hygiene, cybercrime, cybersecurity terminology, cybersecurity awareness, human behavior, organizational culture, conceptual analysis, cybersecurity education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
