Introduction
Open accessAbstract
Brief introduction to the UNFCCC Paris Agreement and its main goals, followed by the project background, motivation and objectives. Presentation of the specific research questions for the energy and climate scenario development. Short overview of published 100% renewable energy scenarios and the main differences between those scenarios and the newly developed 1.5 °C and 2.0 °C scenarios presented in the book. Overview about the basic assumptions in regard to technology preferences in future energy pathways. Discussion of the advantages and limitations of scenarios in the energy and climate debate.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research on transition dynamics indicates that the speed of transition assumed in this research is possible and not out of reach.
“Research on transition dynamics indicate that the speed of transition assumed in this research is possible and not out of reach.”
From Global Transportation Demand Development with Impacts on the Energy Demand and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in a Climate-Constrained World (2019) · cites this paper as [169]
Several research teams find similar results to this research for the transition in the transport sector.
“Several research teams [169-172] find similar results to this research for the transition in the transport sector as summarized in Table 27.”
From Global Transportation Demand Development with Impacts on the Energy Demand and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in a Climate-Constrained World (2019) · cites this paper as [169]
Indications of this study and results by Jacobson et al., Teske and Pursiheimo clearly indicate a massive increase in electricity demand for a sustainable transport sector, whereas this study and Jacobson et al. project a transport sector practically fully based on electricity in 2050, via direct and indirect electrification, avoiding sustainability conflicts of biofuels and respecting guardrails.
“Indications of this study and also results by Jacobson et al. [170], Teske [169] and Pursiheimo et al. [172] clearly indicate a massive increase in electricity demand for a sustainable transport sector, whereas this study and Jacobson et al. [170] project a transport sector practically fully based on electricity in 2050, via direct and indirect electrification, and thus avoiding sustainability”
From Global Transportation Demand Development with Impacts on the Energy Demand and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in a Climate-Constrained World (2019) · cites this paper as [169]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 5 · Cited by 70
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Mohn, K. (2016) Undressing the emperor: A critical review of IEA's WEO. University of Stavanger Business School, Norwegian School of Economics. Available at: http://www1.uis.no/ansatt/ odegaard/uis_wps_econ_fin/uis_wps_2016_06_mohn.pdf
- Authors
- Teske, S., & Pregger, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Teske, Sven
- Venue
- Achieving the Paris Climate Agreement Goals
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 1-4
- OpenAlex
- W4231994076
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 21.58
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Keywords
- Paris Agreement, energy pathways, technology preferences, climate change mitigation, UNFCCC
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
