Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 357

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Full RNS Variant of Approximate Homomorphic Encryption

Open access
Cheon, Jung Hee, Han, Kyoohyung, Kim, Andrey, Kim, Miran, Song, Yongsoo·2019·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Abstract

The technology of homomorphic encryption has improved rapidly in a few years. The cutting edge implementations are efficient enough to use in practical applications. Recently, Cheon et al. (ASI-ACRYPT’17) proposed a homomorphic encryption scheme which supports an arithmetic of approximate numbers over encryption. This scheme shows the current best performance in computation over the real numbers, but its implementation could not employ core optimization techniques based on the Residue Number System (RNS) decomposition and the Number Theoretic Transformation (NTT). In this paper, we present a variant of approximate homomorphic encryption which is optimal for implementation on standard computer system. We first introduce a new structure of ciphertext modulus which allows us to use both the RNS decomposition of cyclotomic polynomials and the NTT conversion on each of the RNS components. We also suggest new approximate modulus switching procedures without any RNS composition. Compared to previous exact algorithms requiring multi-precision arithmetic, our algorithms can be performed by using only word size (64-bit) operations. Our scheme achieves a significant performance gain from its full RNS implementation. For example, compared to the earlier implementation, our implementation showed speed-ups 17.3, 6.4, and 8.3 times for decryption, constant multiplication, and homomorphic multiplication, respectively, when the dimension of a cyclotomic ring is 32768. We also give experimental result for evaluations of some advanced circuits used in machine learning or statistical analysis. Finally, we demonstrate the practicability of our library by applying to machine learning algorithm. For example, our single core implementation takes 1.8 minutes to build a logistic regression model from encrypted data when the dataset consists of 575 samples, compared to the previous best result 3.5 minutes using four cores.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-10970-7_16

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 357

Metadata

Authors
Cheon, J. H., Han, K., Kim, A., Kim, M., & Song, Y.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2019
Volume
11349
Pages
347-368
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2899140612
Cited by
357
References
27
FWCI
9.92
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Full RNS Variant of Approximate Homomorphic Encryption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-030-10970-7_16
The paper
Cheon, J. H., Han, K., Kim, A., Kim, M., & Song, Y. (2019). A Full RNS Variant of Approximate Homomorphic Encryption. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10970-7_16

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.