The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products 109
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microalgal biomarkers: A review of recent research developments
Volkman, J. K., Barrett, S. M., Blackburn, S. I., Mansour, M. P., Sikes, E. L., & Gelin, F. (1998) · Organic Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0146-6380(98)00062-x · Cited by 1,255
Marine Natural Products and Related Compounds in Clinical and Advanced Preclinical Trials
Newman, D. J., & Cragg, G. M. (2004) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/np040031y · Cited by 759
Phytoecdysteroids: Biological aspects
Dinan, L. (2001) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0031-9422(01)00078-4 · Cited by 392
Plant natural products: Back to the future or into extinction?
McChesney, J. D., Venkataraman, S. K., & Henri, J. T. (2007) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.04.032 · Cited by 377
Bacterial siderophores efficiently provide iron to iron-starved tomato plants in hydroponics culture
Radzki, W., Gutierrez Mañero, F. J., Algar, E., Lucas García, J. A., García-Villaraco, A., & Ramos Solano, B. (2013) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1007/s10482-013-9954-9 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Venue
- Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 0071-7886 (ISSN-L)
- 2191-7043
- 2192-4309
- OpenAlex
- W648114127
- Cited by
- 2,052
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.05
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products 109. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-030-12858-6
- The paper
- Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products 109. (2019). Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12858-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
