CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

OceanGraph: Some Initial Steps Toward a Oceanographic Knowledge Graph

Zárate, Marcos, Rosales, Pablo, Braun, Germán, Lewis, Mirtha, Fillottrani, Pablo Rubén, Delrieux, Claudio·2019·Communications in Computer and Information Science
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-21395-4_3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-21395-4_3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • FOAF ontology is used in [71, 73] to materialize implicit knowledge about the social relationships of authors and scientists.

    “A Friend Of A Friend (FOAF) ontology is used in [71, 73] to materialize implicit knowledge about the social relationships of authors and scientists.”

    From Scholarly knowledge graphs through structuring scholarly communication: a review (2023) · cites this paper as [73]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O., et al.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American (2001) · DOI
  2. Paulheim, H.: Knowledge graph refinement: a survey of approaches and evaluation methods. Semant. Web J. 8, 489–508 (2016) · DOI · Paper page
  3. Sequeda, J.F., Kejriwal, M., Lopez, V.: Construction, management and querying. Semant. Web J. (2018). Special Issue on Knowledge Graphs · DOI
  4. Wöß, W., Ehrlinger, L.: Towards a definition of knowledge graphs. In: 12th International Conference on Semantic Systems - SEMANTiCS 2016 (2016)
  5. Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked data-the story so far. In: Semantic Services, Interoperability and Web Applications: Emerging Concepts (2009) · DOI
  6. Malik, T., Foster, I.: Addressing data access needs of the long-tail distribution of geoscientists. In: 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), pp. 5348–5351. IEEE (2012) · DOI
  7. Campbell, P.: Data’s shameful neglect. Nature 461(7261), 145 (2009)
  8. Page, R.D.M.: Ozymandias: a biodiversity knowledge graph. bioRxiv (2018) · DOI
  9. Cheatham, M., et al.: The GeoLink knowledge graph. Big Earth Data (2018) · DOI
  10. Muller-Karger, F.E., et al.: Advancing marine biological observations and data requirements of the complementary essential ocean variables (EOVS) and essential biodiversity variables (EBVS) frameworks. Front. Mar. Sci. 5, 211 (2018) · DOI
  11. Pearson, R.G., Dawson, T.P.: Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 12(5), 361–371 (2003) · DOI · Paper page
  12. Wieczorek, J., et al.: Darwin core: an evolving community-developed biodiversity data standard. PLoS ONE 7, 1–8 (2012) · DOI
  13. Springer Nature SciGraph. http://www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/scigraph . Accessed 24 Jan 2019
  14. Leadbetter, A., Lowry, R., Clements, D.O.: The NERC vocabulary server: version 2.0. In: Geophysical Research Abstracts, vol. 14 (2012)
  15. Battle, R., Kolas, D.: Enabling the geospatial semantic web with parliament and GeoSPARQL. Semant. Web 3(4), 355–370 (2012) · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zárate, M., Rosales, P., Braun, G., Lewis, M., Fillottrani, P. R., & Delrieux, C.
Venue
Communications in Computer and Information Science
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2019
Pages
33-40
ISSN
  • 1865-0929
  • 1865-0937
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-21395-4_3
Cited by
6
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review