The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-Subject EEG Signal Classification with Deep Neural Networks Applied to Motor Imagery
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Deep learning is a method that advocates end-to-end learning. In this method, deep neural networks process the original data without any preprocessing and decompose the data into multiple levels of abstraction to automatically extract relevant features [9], which can learn high-level representation from the raw input features and effectively achieve the classi cation goal.”
From Multimodal Emotion Recognition Using a Hierarchical Fusion Convolutional Neural Network (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
EEGNet: a compact convolutional neural network for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces
Lawhern, V. J., Solon, A. J., Waytowich, N. R., Gordon, S. M., Hung, C. P., & Lance, B. J. (2018) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aace8c · Cited by 5,115
A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces: A 10 year update
Lotte, F., Bougrain, L., Cichocki, A., Clerc, M., Congedo, M., Rakotomamonjy, A., & Yger, F. (2018) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aab2f2 · Cited by 2,239
Brain Computer Interfaces, a Review
Nicolas-Alonso, L. F., & Gomez-Gil, J. (2012) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s120201211 · Cited by 2,143
Motor imagery and direct brain-computer communication
Pfurtscheller, G., & Neuper, C. (2001) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.939829 · Cited by 1,990
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Baldi, P., Sadowski, P.J.: Understanding dropout. In: Burges, C.J.C., Bottou, L., Welling, M., Ghahramani, Z., Weinberger, K.Q. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26, vol. 00125, pp. 2814–2822. Curran Associates, Inc. (2013)
- Cho, K., et al.: Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation. arXiv:1406.1078 [cs, stat], June 2014 · DOI · Paper page
- Clevert, D.A., Unterthiner, T., Hochreiter, S.: Fast and accurate deep network learning by exponential linear units (ELUs). arXiv:1511.07289 [cs], November 2015 · arXiv
- Glorot, X., Bengio, Y.: Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks, vol. 03417, p. 8 (2010)
- Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A.: Deep learning. In: Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning, The MIT Press. Cambridge (2016)
- Goodfellow, I.J., et al.: Generative adversarial networks. arXiv:1406.2661 [cs, stat], June 2014 · arXiv
- Hjorth, B.: EEG analysis based on time domain properties. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 29(3), 306–310 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(70)90143-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Kaur, E.T., Singh, B.: Brain computer interface: a review. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 04(04), 9 (2017)
- Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980 [cs], December 2014 · arXiv
- Lotte, F., Congedo, M., Lécuyer, A., Lamarche, F., Arnaldi, B.: A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces. J. Neural Eng. 4(2), R1–R13 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/4/2/R01 . 01903 · DOI · Paper page
- Mao, W., Zhu, J., Li, X., Zhang, X., Sun, S.: Resting state EEG based depression recognition research using deep learning method. In: Wang, S., Yamamoto, V., Su, J., Yang, Y., Jones, E., Iasemidis, L., Mitchell, T. (eds.) BI 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11309, pp. 329–338. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05587-5_31 · DOI
- McFarland, D.J., Wolpaw, J.R.: Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Commun. ACM 54(5), 60 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1941487.1941506 . 06351 · DOI
- Nijholt, A.: BCI for games: a ‘state of the art’ survey. In: Stevens, S.M., Saldamarco, S.J. (eds.) ICEC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5309, pp. 225–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89222-9_29 · DOI
- Pascanu, R., Mikolov, T., Bengio, Y.: On the difficulty of training Recurrent Neural Networks. arXiv:1211.5063 [cs], November 2012 · arXiv
- Ramadan, R.A., Vasilakos, A.V.: Brain computer interface: control signals review. Neurocomputing 223, 26–44 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2016.10.024 · DOI
- Schirrmeister, R.T., Gemein, L., Eggensperger, K., Hutter, F., Ball, T.: Deep learning with convolutional neural networks for decoding and visualization of EEG pathology. arXiv:1708.08012 [cs, stat], August 2017 · DOI
- Smith, S.L., Kindermans, P.J., Ying, C., Le, Q.V.: Don’t decay the learning rate, increase the batch size. arXiv:1711.00489 [cs, stat], November 2017 · arXiv
- Sun, M., Wang, F., Min, T., Zang, T., Wang, Y.: Prediction for high risk clinical symptoms of epilepsy based on deep learning algorithm. IEEE Access 1–1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2883562 · DOI
- Tan, C., Sun, F., Zhang, W., Chen, J., Liu, C.: Multimodal classification with deep convolutional-recurrent neural networks for electroencephalography. arXiv:1807.10641 [cs], July 2018 · DOI
- Tan, C., Sun, F., Zhang, W., Chen, J., Liu, C.: Multimodal classification with deep convolutional-recurrent neural networks for electroencephalography. In: Liu, D., Xie, S., Li, Y., Zhao, D., El-Alfy, E.S. (eds.) ICONIP 2017. LNCS, vol. 10635, pp. 767–776. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70096-0_78 · DOI
- Tangermann, M., et al.: Review of the BCI competition IV. Front. Neurosci. 6, (2012). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00055 · DOI · Paper page
- Vaid, S., Singh, P., Kaur, C.: EEG signal analysis for BCI interface: a review. In: Fifth International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Technologies (ACCT), 2015, pp. 143–147. IEEE (2015)
- Wang, P., Jiang, A., Liu, X., Shang, J., Zhang, L.: LSTM-based EEG classification in motor imagery tasks. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 26(11), 2086–2095 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2876129 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multimodal Emotion Recognition Using a Hierarchical Fusion Convolutional Neural Network
Zhang, Y., Cheng, C., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3049516 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Riyad, M., Khalil, M., & Adib, A.
- Corresponding author
- Riyad, Mouad
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 124-139
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2951451556
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 3.02
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Keywords
- motor imagery, sensorimotor rhythm, EEG classification, cross-subject classification, brain-computer interface, deep neural network, temporal convolution, spatial convolution, recurrent layers, dropout regularization, EEGNet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review