The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continuous Architecting with Microservices and DevOps: A Systematic Mapping Study
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The testing and deployment cycle is slowed considerably in microservice systems by continuous code reworking.
“They claim that the testing and deployment cycle is slowed considerably in microservice systems by continuous code reworking.”
From Challenges and Solutions in Implementing Continuous Integration and Continuous Testing for Agile Quality Assurance (2023) · cites this paper as [103]
Section 3.5 (pp. 15–16) says rapidly evolving code affects what microservice tests should focus on and that running a growing test suite is time-consuming. It does not say continuous code reworking considerably slows the testing-and-deployment cycle; the reported testing delay is attributed to test-suite size. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wohlin, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2601248.2601268 · Cited by 4,234 · cited 5×
“– Comprehensiveness : We included results from eight bibliographic sources and papers from the citations of the retrieved papers [19] to increase the paper base.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSystematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering
Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., & Mattsson, M. (2008) · Electronic Workshops in Computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/ease2008.8 · Cited by 3,239 · cited 3×
“Therefore, we designed this work as a Systematic Mapping Study [13, 19].”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Balalaie, A., Heydarnoori, A., Jamshidi, P.: Microservices architecture enables DevOps: migration to a cloud-native architecture. IEEE Softw. 33(3), 42–52 (2016) · DOI · Paper page
- Bass, L., Weber, I., Zhu, L.: DevOps: A Software Architects Perspective, 1st edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2015)
- Di Cosmo, R., Eiche, A., Mauro, J., Zacchiroli, S., Zavattaro, G., Zwolakowski, J.: Automatic deployment of services in the cloud with aeolus blender. In: Barros, A., Grigori, D., Narendra, N.C., Dam, H.K. (eds.) ICSOC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9435, pp. 397–411. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48616-0_28 · DOI
- ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119 Software Testing (2014). http://www.softwaretestingstandard.org/
- Jamshidi, P., Pahl, C., Mendonca, N.C.: Pattern-based multi-cloud architecture migration. Softw. Pract. Exp. 47(9), 1159–1184 (2017) · DOI
- Jamshidi, P., Pahl, C., Mendonca, N.C., Lewis, J., Tilkov, S.: Microservices: the journey so far and challenges ahead. IEEE Softw. 35(3), 24–35 (2018) · DOI
- Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P.: A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering. Inf. Softw. Technol. 55(12), 2049–2075 (2013) · DOI · Paper page
- Pahl, C., Jamshidi, P.: Microservices: a systematic mapping study. In: International Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science (2016) · DOI
- Pahl, C., Jamshidi, P., Zimmermann, O.: Architectural principles for cloud software. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 18(2), 17 (2018) · DOI
- Taibi, D., Lenarduzzi, V., Pahl, C.: Processes, motivations, and issues for migrating to microservices architectures: an empirical investigation. IEEE Cloud Comput. 4(5), 22–32 (2017) · DOI
- Taibi, D., Lenarduzzi, V., Pahl, C.: Architectural patterns for microservices: a systematic mapping study. In: International Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science, pp. 221–232 (2018) · DOI
- Taibi, D., Lenarduzzi, V.: On the definition of microservices bad architectural smells. IEEE Softw. 35(3), 56–62 (2018) · DOI
- Taibi, D., Systä, K.: From monolithic systems to microservices: a decomposition framework based on process mining. In: 8th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science, CLOSER (2019) · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bhanushali, A. (2023) · International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) · doi:10.21275/sr231021114758 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Taibi, D., Lenarduzzi, V., & Pahl, C.
- Affiliations
- Tampere University (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Taibi, Davide
- Lenarduzzi, Valentina
- Pahl, Claus
- Venue
- Communications in Computer and Information Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 126-151
- ISSN
- 1865-0929 (ISSN-L)
- 1865-0937
- OpenAlex
- W2967526053
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 6.27
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Communications in computer and information science (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (submittedVersion)
- Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Keywords
- microservices, DevOps, cloud migration, microservice orchestration, microservice deployment, release management, continuous delivery, software architecture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
