Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 24Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationYouth, Politics, and SocietyPolitical Theory and Democracy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consequences of Lowering the Voting Age to 16: Lessons from Comparative Research

Franklin, Mark N.·2020·Lowering the Voting Age to 16

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-32541-1_2

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Franklin, M. (2004). The dynamics of electoral competition since 1945. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Cited by

See all 24

Metadata

Authors
Franklin, M. N.
Affiliations
Trinity College (US)
Corresponding author
Franklin, Mark N.
Venue
Lowering the Voting Age to 16
Published
2019-11-28
Pages
13-41
OpenAlex
W2991644154
Cited by
24
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
25.11
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Economic and Social Research Council UK (ES/M010856/1)
  • The Research Council of Norway (Project no. 249687)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth, Politics, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
Keywords
voting age, 16-year-olds, youth voter turnout, voting age lowering, young voters, political maturity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consequences of Lowering the Voting Age to 16: Lessons from Comparative Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-030-32541-1_2
The paper
Franklin, M. N. (2020). Consequences of Lowering the Voting Age to 16: Lessons from Comparative Research. Lowering the Voting Age to 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32541-1_2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.