Cited by 11Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political ViolenceCrime, Illicit Activities, and GovernanceCrime, Deviance, and Social Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The ‘War on Terror’, State Crime & Radicalization: A Constitutive Theory of Radicalization

Ahmed, Shamila·2020·Springer eBooks

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-40138-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the clinical realm, defining these categories is complexified by the fact that they have been extensively involved in specific power relations and institutionalized othering processes.

    “In the clinical realm, defining these categories is further complexified by the fact that they have been extensively involved in specific power relations and institutionalized othering processes (Ahmed, 2020; Hörnqvist & Flyghed, 2012; Wolff, 1969).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ahmed, S.
Affiliations
University of Westminster (GB)
Corresponding author
Ahmed, Shamila
Venue
Springer eBooks
Published
2020
OpenAlex
W4240665884
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.07
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
Keywords
war on terror, state crimes, radicalization, terrorism, September 11 attacks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review