Cited by 22Immune Cell Function and InteractionImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesImmune cells in cancer

Natural Killer Cell Immunotherapy for Osteosarcoma

Tullius, Brian P., Setty, Buhvana A., Lee, Dean A.·2020·Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

Abstract

Natural killer (NK) cells are lymphocytes of the innate immune system that have the ability to recognize malignant cells through balanced recognition of cell-surface indicators of stress and danger. Once activated through such recognition, NK cells release cytokines and induce target cell lysis through multiple mechanisms. NK cells are increasingly recognized for their role in controlling tumor progression and metastasis and as important mediators of immunotherapeutic modalities such as cytokines, antibodies, immunomodulating drugs, and stem cell transplantation. Recent advances in manipulating NK cell number, function, and genetic modification have caused renewed interest in their potential for adoptive immunotherapies, which are actively being tested in clinical trials. Here, we summarize the evidence for NK cell recognition of osteosarcoma, discuss immune therapies that are directly or indirectly dependent on NK cell function, and describe potential approaches for manipulating NK cell number and function to enhance therapy against osteosarcoma.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-43032-0_12

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emerging preclinical data for chimeric antigen receptor T cell and CAR natural killer cell therapies in osteosarcoma are encouraging.

    “The emerging preclinical data for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T and CAR natural killer cell therapies are encouraging 88,89 ,”

    From Osteosarcoma (2022) · cites this paper as [89]

  • Several emerging immune-based approaches other than immune-checkpoint inhibitors have generated encouraging preclinical results in osteosarcoma.

    “although several emerging immune-based approaches other than the use of ICIs have generated encouraging preclinical results 86,87,88,89,91 .”

    From Osteosarcoma (2022) · cites this paper as [89]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tullius, B. P., Setty, B. A., & Lee, D. A.
Affiliations
Nationwide Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, Dean A.
Venue
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
Published
2020
Volume
1257
Pages
141-154
ISSN
  • 0065-2598 (ISSN-L)
  • 2214-8019
OpenAlex
W3030860471
Cited by
22
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.14
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in experimental medicine and biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune cells in cancer
Keywords
natural killer cells, osteosarcoma, adoptive immunotherapy, tumor immunology, cytokines, antibody therapy, immunomodulators, stem cell transplantation, tumor progression and metastasis
MeSH terms
Bone Neoplasms, Humans, Immunotherapy, Killer Cells, Natural, Osteosarcoma, Immunotherapy, Adoptive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review