Cited by 29Vitamin D Research StudiesNutritional Studies and DietSkin Protection and Aging

Vitamin D Status and Cancer Incidence, Survival, and Mortality

Kim, Hanseul, Giovannucci, Edward·2020·Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

Abstract

Over the last several decades, extensive research on vitamin D and its role on cancer incidence, cancer survival (survival or mortality from cancer among individuals diagnosed with cancer), and cancer mortality (fatal cases occurring during the study period in an initially cancer-free population) has been conducted. A variety of study designs were implemented to explore vitamin D status, assessed by measuring sun exposure, vitamin D intake, and circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration. Although not many randomized controlled trials have examined the relationship between vitamin D and cancer incidence, observational studies have consistently shown a protective association between vitamin D and cancer incidence, especially for colorectal cancer. In addition, randomized controlled trials and most observational studies suggested that vitamin D plays a role in reducing cancer mortality. The potential benefit of vitamin D on cancer mortality may operate during the pre-diagnostic stages by affecting late-stage tumor progression and metastatic seeding, during the treatment phase by complementing or enhancing effects of therapies, or during the post-diagnostic stages. However, further studies are needed to confirm these conclusions, establish the optimal dosage and timing of vitamin D intakes for the most benefit, find which cancer types are affected, and understand the underlying mechanisms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-46227-7_3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is abundant evidence that ultraviolet radiation is carcinogenic to humans, and it forms the major driver of other underlying medical conditions ranging from eye defects, sunburn, skin disorder and hair damage.

    “Generally, there is abundant evidence that ultraviolet radiation is carcinogenic to humans, and it forms the major driver of other underlying medical conditions ranging from eye defects, sunburn, skin disorder and hair damage”

    From Skin protection from solar ultraviolet radiation using natural compounds: a review (2024) · cites this paper as Kim & Giovannucci 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, H., & Giovannucci, E.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Giovannucci, Edward
Venue
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
Published
2020
Volume
1268
Pages
39-52
ISSN
  • 0065-2598 (ISSN-L)
  • 2214-8019
OpenAlex
W3084628403
Cited by
29
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
19.55
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in experimental medicine and biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
Keywords
vitamin D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, cancer incidence, cancer survival, cancer mortality, colorectal cancer, sun exposure, vitamin D intake, circulating vitamin D levels, tumor progression, metastasis, vitamin D supplementation
MeSH terms
Humans, Neoplasms, Vitamin D, Vitamins, Colorectal Neoplasms, Incidence, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review