Responding to KRACK: Wi-Fi Security Awareness in Private Households
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An exploratory study (Aug 2020) indicated that overall 65% of Wi-Fi and IoT devices tested are vulnerable to key reinstallation attacks.
“Another recent exploratory study (Aug 2020) presented in (Freudenreich et al., 2020) critically indicates that overall, 65% of Wi-Fi and IoT devices tested are vulnerable to key reinstallation attacks.”
From Multi-Channel Man-in-the-Middle attacks against protected Wi-Fi networks: A state of the art review (2022) · cites this paper as Freudenreich et al., 2020
Freudenreich et al. 2020 concluded that around 65% of tested mobiles and IoT devices are still vulnerable to different types of key reinstallation attacks due to unavailability of patches.
“A recent experimental study (August 2020) presented by (Freudenreich et al., 2020) also concludes that several mobiles and IoT devices (around 65 % among tested) are still vulnerable to different types of key reinstallation attacks due to the unavailability of patches from respective device manufacturers.”
From Multi-Channel Man-in-the-Middle attacks against protected Wi-Fi networks: A state of the art review (2022) · cites this paper as Freudenreich et al., 2020
While most people are aware of key reinstallation vulnerabilities, they struggle or never perform patching due to lack of substantial technical knowledge.
“While most people are aware of the key reinstallation vulnerabilities, they struggle or sometimes never perform patching due to the lack of substantial technical knowledge”
From Multi-Channel Man-in-the-Middle attacks against protected Wi-Fi networks: A state of the art review (2022) · cites this paper as Freudenreich et al., 2020
Cites
Key Reinstallation Attacks: Forcing Nonce Reuse in WPA2
Vanhoef, M., & Piessens, F. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3133956.3134027 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Dragonblood: Analyzing the Dragonfly Handshake of WPA3 and EAP-pwd
Vanhoef, M., & Ronen, E. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp40000.2020.00031 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Poole, E. S., Chetty, M., Morgan, T., Grinter, R. E., & Edwards, W. K. (2009) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1518701.1518816 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
End user cybercrime reporting: what we know and what we can do to improve it
Bidgoli, M., & Großklags, J. (2016) · doi:10.1109/icccf.2016.7740424 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
An Empirical Study of Android Security Bulletins in Different Vendors
Farhang, S., Kirdan, M. B., Lászka, Á., & Großklags, J. (2020) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3366423.3380078 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Farhang, S., Weidman, J., Kamani, M. M., Großklags, J., & Liu, P. (2018) · Annual Computer Security Applications Conference · doi:10.1145/3274694.3274733 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationSchechter, S. E. (2013) · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 8 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multi-Channel Man-in-the-Middle attacks against protected Wi-Fi networks: A state of the art review
Thankappan, M., Rifà-Pous, H., & Garrigues, C. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118401 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Thankappan, M., Rifà-Pous, H., & Garrigues, C. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3362803 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
A Survey of User Perspectives on Security and Privacy in a Home Networking Environment
Pattnaik, N., Li, S., & Nurse, J. R. C. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3558095 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Exploring Wi-Fi WPA2 KRACK Vulnerability: A Review Paper
Alhamry, M., & Elmedany, W. M. (2022) · International Conference on Data Analytics for Business and Industry (ICDABI) · doi:10.1109/icdabi56818.2022.10041548 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Tiwari, H., Tomar, A., Patil, S., Patil, S., Gangane, J., & Kate, S. (2024) · Global Conference on Wireless and Optical Technologies (GCWOT) · doi:10.1109/gcwot63882.2024.10805625 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Thankappan, M., Rifà-Pous, H., & Garrigues, C. (2022) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.19773136.v1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Multi-channel Man-in-the-Middle Attacks Against Protected Wi-Fi Networks and Their Attack Signatures
Thankappan, M., Rifà-Pous, H., & Garrigues, C. (2023) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-39811-7_22 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Multi-Channel Attacks ReviewPreprint
Thankappan, M. (2022) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.19773136
Multi-Channel Attacks ReviewPreprint
Thankappan, M., Rifà-Pous, H., & Garrigues, C. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.19773136.v2
- Authors
- Freudenreich, J., Weidman, J., & Grossklags, J.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grossklags, Jens
- Venue
- IFIP advances in information and communication technology
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- AICT-593
- Pages
- 233-243
- ISSN
- 1868-422X (ISSN-L)
- 1868-4238
- OpenAlex
- W3081326103
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- inria.hal.science
- Licence
- Locations
- IFIP advances in information and communication technology (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Keywords
- Wi-Fi security, security awareness, private households, software updates, vulnerability management, information dissemination, home network security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
