Cited by 894Video Surveillance and Tracking MethodsAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Ocean: Object-Aware Anchor-Free Tracking

Open access
Zhang, Zhipeng, Peng, Houwen, Fu, Jianlong, Li, Bing, Hu, Weiming·2020·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-58589-1_46

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous trackers' pipelines are complicated: they generate many box proposals with confidence scores and use post-processing to choose the best bounding box.

    “The tracking pipelines of previous trackers [25, 51, 60, 47] are complicated. Specifically, they first generate a large number of box proposals with confidence scores, then use various post-processing to choose the best bounding box as the tracking result.”

    From Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Tracking (2021) · cites this paper as [60]

  • STARK-ST50+AR surpasses previous SOTA trackers like AlphaRef and OceanPlus, getting an EAO of 0.505 on VOT2020.

    “The new tracker 'STARK-ST50+AR' surpasses previous SOTA trackers, like AlphaRef and OceanPlus [60], getting an EAO of 0.505.”

    From Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Tracking (2021) · cites this paper as [60]

  • Previous models have to improve nonlinear representation ability by introducing fashion structures, using additional modules, or designing effective online updaters.

    “Thus, previous models have to improve the nonlinear representation ability by introducing fashion structures [21, 44, 48], using additional modules [7, 46, 13], designing effective online updaters [2, 47, 10], to name a few.”

    From Transformer Tracking (2021) · cites this paper as [48]

  • Prior work such as SiamRPN, SiamRPN++, and Ocean selects final tracking results using post-processing schemes including cosine window penalty, scale change penalty, and bounding box smoothing.

    “In the prior work such as SiamRPN [22], SiamRPN++ [21] and Ocean [48], the final tracking results are selected by post-processing schemes including cosine window penalty, scale change penalty and bounding box smoothing.”

    From Transformer Tracking (2021) · cites this paper as [48]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Z., Peng, H., Fu, J., Li, B., & Hu, W.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN)
Corresponding author
Peng, Houwen
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2020
Pages
771-787
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W3108519869
Cited by
894
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 147 · 2024: 200 · 2023: 241 · 2022: 165 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 9
FWCI
39.02
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
object tracking, Siamese tracker, feature alignment, bounding box regression, tracking robustness, video object tracking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review