Cited by 8Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchMetabolism and Genetic DisordersGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

The Drosophila melanogaster as Genetic Model System to Dissect the Mechanisms of Disease that Lead to Neurodegeneration in Adrenoleukodystrophy

Bülow, Margret H., Parsons, Brendon D., Di Cara, Francesca·2020·Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster is the most successful genetic model organism to study different human disease with a recent increased popularity to study neurological disorders. Drosophila melanogaster has a complex yet well-defined brain with defined anatomical regions with specific functions. The neuronal network in the adult brain has a structural organization highly similar to human neurons, but in a brain that is much more amenable for complex analyses. The availability of sophisticated genetic tools to study neurons permits to examine neuronal functions at the single cell level in the whole brain by confocal imaging, which does not require sections. Thus, Drosophila has been used to successfully study many neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease and has been recently adopted to understand the complex networks leading to neurological disorders with metabolic origins such as Leigh disease and X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD).In this review, we will describe the genetic tools available to study neuronal structures and functions and also illustrate some limitations of the system. Finally, we will report the experimental efforts that in the past 10 years have established Drosophila melanogaster as an excellent model organism to study neurodegenerative disorders focusing on X-ALD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-60204-8_11

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Drosophila abcd1 mutants have brain VLCFA accumulation, locomotor impairment, and other abnormalities.

    “Drosophila abcd1 mutants were found to have brain VLCFA accumulation, locomotor impairment, and other abnormalities [192].”

    From Revisiting the Pathogenesis of X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy (2025) · cites this paper as [192]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bülow, M. H., Parsons, B. D., & Di Cara, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Bülow, Margret H.
Venue
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
Published
2020
Volume
1299
Pages
145-159
ISSN
  • 0065-2598 (ISSN-L)
  • 2214-8019
OpenAlex
W3120731146
Cited by
8
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.55
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in experimental medicine and biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
Drosophila melanogaster, X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy, neurodegeneration, genetic model organisms, neurological disorders, neuronal networks, single-cell imaging, genetic instruments, metabolic disorders, Parkinson's disease, Leigh syndrome
MeSH terms
Adrenoleukodystrophy, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Drosophila melanogaster, Humans, Models, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review