Cited by 19Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataStochastic Gradient Optimization TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Federated Gradient Averaging for Multi-Site Training with Momentum-Based Optimizers

Open access
Remedios, Samuel W., Butman, John A., Landman, Bennett A., Pham, Dzung L.·2020·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Abstract

Multi-site training methods for artificial neural networks are of particular interest to the medical machine learning community primarily due to the difficulty of data sharing between institutions. However, contemporary multi-site techniques such as weight averaging and cyclic weight transfer make theoretical sacrifices to simplify implementation. In this paper, we implement federated gradient averaging (FGA), a variant of federated learning without data transfer that is mathematically equivalent to single site training with centralized data. We evaluate two scenarios: a simulated multi-site dataset for handwritten digit classification with MNIST and a real multi-site dataset with head CT hemorrhage segmentation. We compare federated gradient averaging to single site training, federated weight averaging (FWA), and cyclic weight transfer. In the MNIST task, we show that training with FGA results in a weight set equivalent to centralized single site training. In the hemorrhage segmentation task, we show that FGA achieves on average superior results to both FWA and cyclic weight transfer due to its ability to leverage momentum-based optimization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-60548-3_17

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [8]Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A: Deep learning. MIT press (2016)
  2. [10]Kingma DP, Ba J: Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprintarXiv:1412.6980 (2014)
  3. [27]Ruder S: An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms. arXiv preprintarXiv:1609.04747 (2016)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Remedios, S. W., Butman, J. A., Landman, B. A., & Pham, D. L.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Henry M. Jackson Foundation (US)
Corresponding author
Remedios, Samuel W.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2020
Volume
12444
Pages
170-180
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W3088370288
Cited by
19
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2021: 6
FWCI
1.15
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB017230)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
machine learning in medicine, data sharing between institutions, handwritten digit recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review