Cited by 3Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningOnline Learning and AnalyticsOpen Education and E-Learning

Applying Bayesian Network to Assess the Levels of Skills Mastering in Adaptive Dynamic OER-Systems

Nekhaev, Igor, Zhuykov, Ilya, Manukyants, Suren, Maslennikov, Artyom·2020·Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-63322-6_94

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nekhaev, I., Zhuykov, I., Manukyants, S., & Maslennikov, A.
Affiliations
Volga State University of Technology (RU)
Corresponding author
Nekhaev, Igor
Venue
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
Published
2020
Pages
1090-1116
ISSN
  • 2194-5357 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-5365
OpenAlex
W3112835264
Cited by
3
References
25
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.19
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in intelligent systems and computing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Education and E-Learning
Keywords
open educational resources, open educational practices, adaptive learning systems, MOOCs, data-driven evaluation, learning analytics, prediction of learning outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review