The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Creating a Scholarly Knowledge Graph from Survey Article Tables
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Table metadata extraction possesses diverse challenges due to lack of standardization.
“For example, table metadata extraction [126] possess diverse challenges due to lack of standardization.”
From Scholarly knowledge graphs through structuring scholarly communication: a review (2023) · cites this paper as [126]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., et al. (2016) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18 · Cited by 18,423
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Adelfio, M.D., Samet, H.: Schema extraction for tabular data on the web. Proc. VLDB Endowment 6, 421–432 (2013). https://doi.org/10.14778/2536336.2536343 · DOI
- Corrêa, A.S., Corrêa, P.L.P., Da Silva, F.S.C.: Transparency portals versus open government data. An assessment of openness in Brazilian municipalities. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 178–185 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2612733.2612760 · DOI
- Corrêa, A.S., Zander, P.O.: Unleashing tabular content to open data: a survey on PDF table extraction methods and tools. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 54–63 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3085228.3085278 · DOI
- Fathalla, S., Vahdati, S., Auer, S., Lange, C.: Towards a knowledge graph representing research findings by semantifying survey articles. In: Kamps, J., Tsakonas, G., Manolopoulos, Y., Iliadis, L., Karydis, I. (eds.) TPDL 2017. LNCS, vol. 10450, pp. 315–327. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67008-9_25 · DOI
- Gall, M.D., Borg, W.R.: Educational Research: An introduction, 6th edn. Longman Publishers USA, White Plains (1996)
- Hart, C.: Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1998)
- Hassan, T., Baumgartner, R.: Table recognition and understanding from PDF files. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, ICDAR, pp. 1143–1147 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2007.4377094 · DOI
- Herrmannova, D., Knoth, P.: An analysis of the microsoft academic graph. D-lib Mag. 22(9/10) (2016). https://doi.org/10.1045/september2016-herrmannova · DOI
- Hyvönen, E.: Publishing and using cultural heritage linked data on the semantic web. Synth. Lect. Semant. Web Theory Technol. 2(1), 1–159 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2200/S00452ED1V01Y201210WBE003 · DOI
- Jaradeh, M.Y., et al.: Open research knowledge graph: Next generation infrastructure for semantic scholarly knowledge. In: K-CAP 2019 - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Knowledge Capture, pp. 243–246 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3360901.3364435 · DOI
- Jiang, D., Yang, X.: Converting PDF to HTML approach based on text detection. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interaction Sciences: Information Technology, Culture and Human, vol. 403, pp. 982–985 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1655925.1656103 · DOI
- Klampfl, S., Granitzer, M., Jack, K., Kern, R.: Unsupervised document structure analysis of digital scientific articles. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 14(3), 83–99 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-014-0115-1 · DOI
- Körner, M., Ghavimi, B., Mayr, P., Hartmann, H., Staab, S.: Evaluating reference string extraction using line-based conditional random fields: a case study with German language publications. In: Kirikova, M., et al. (eds.) ADBIS 2017. CCIS, vol. 767, pp. 137–145. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67162-8_15 · DOI
- Krotzsch, M., Vrandecic, D.: Wikidata : a free collaborative knowledge base. Commun. ACM 57(10), 78–85 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2629489 · DOI
- Lammey, R.: CrossRef text and data mining services. Insights UKSG J. 28(2), 62–68 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.233 · DOI · Paper page
- Lehmberg, O., Ritze, D., Meusel, R., Bizer, C.: A large public corpus of web tables containing time and context metadata. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web - WWW 2016 Companion (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2872518.2889386 · DOI
- Lipinski, M., Yao, K., Breitinger, C., Beel, J., Gipp, B.: Evaluation of header metadata extraction approaches and tools for scientific PDF documents. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 385–386 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2467696.2467753 · DOI
- Liu, Y., Bai, K., Mitra, P., Giles, C.L.: TableSeer: automatic table metadata extraction and searching in digital libraries. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Digital Libraries - JCDL 2007 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1255175.1255193 · DOI
- Lopez, P.: GROBID: combining automatic bibliographic data recognition and term extraction for scholarship publications. In: Agosti, M., Borbinha, J., Kapidakis, S., Papatheodorou, C., Tsakonas, G. (eds.) ECDL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5714, pp. 473–474. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04346-8_62 · DOI
- Mäkelä, E., Hyvönen, E., Ruotsalo, T.: How to deal with massively heterogeneous cultural heritage data - lessons learned in CultureSampo. Semant. Web 3(1), 85–109 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3233/sw-2012-0049 · DOI
- Mons, B., Velterop, J.: Nano-publication in the e-science era. In: Workshop on Semantic Web Applications in Scientific Discourse (SWASD 2009), pp. 14–15 (2009)
- Oelen, A., Jaradeh, M.Y., Farfar, K.E., Stocker, M., Auer, S.: Comparing research contributions in a scholarly knowledge graph. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Capturing Scientific Knowledge (SciKnow19), pp. 21–26 (2019) · DOI
- Oelen, A., Jaradeh, M.Y., Stocker, M., Auer, S.: Generate FAIR literature surveys with scholarly knowledge graphs. In: JCDL 2020: The 20th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (In Press) (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3383583.3398520 · DOI
- Rastan, R., Paik, H.Y., Shepherd, J.: Texus. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering - DocEng 2015 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2682571.2797069 · DOI
- Skjæveland, M.G., Lian, E.H., Horrocks, I.: Publishing the norwegian petroleum directorate’s FactPages as semantic web data. In: International Semantic Web Conference, vol. 8219, pp. 162–177 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41338-4_11 · DOI
- Takis, J., Islam, A.S., Lange, C., Auer, S.: Crowdsourced semantic annotation of scientific publications and tabular data in pdf. In: SEMANTICS 2015 Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Semantic Systems (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2814864.2814887 · DOI
- Vahdati, S., Fathalla, S., Auer, S., Lange, C., Vidal, M.E.: Semantic representation of scientific publications. In: International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, vol. 11799, pp. 375–379 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30760-8_37 · DOI
- Vasileiadis, M., Kaklanis, N., Votis, K., Tzovaras, D.: Extraction of tabular data from document images. In: Proceedings of the 14th Web for All Conference, W4A (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3058555.3058581 · DOI
- Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: writing a Literature Review. MIS Q. 26(2), xiii–xxiii (2002)
- Wee, B.V., Banister, D.: How to Write a literature review paper? Transp. Rev. 36(2), 278–288 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1065456 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scholarly knowledge graphs through structuring scholarly communication: a review
Verma, S., Bhatia, R., Harit, S., & Batish, S. (2023) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-022-00806-6 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Oelen, A., Stocker, M., & Auer, S.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 373-389
- ISSN
- 0302-9743
- 1611-3349
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review