The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CrossRef Text and Data Mining Services
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GIJIR has a valid ISSN (2994-8312), is indexed by Google Scholar, and its articles receive Crossref DOIs.
“The GIJIR, where the fake article under my name was published, has a valid ISSN (International Standard Serial Number — 2994 - 8312), is indexed by Google Scholar, and its articles receive Crossref [5] DOIs.”
From False authorship: an explorative case study around an AI-generated article published under my name (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Materials Synthesis Insights from Scientific Literature via Text Extraction and Machine Learning
Kim, E., Huang, K., Saunders, A., McCallum, A., Ceder, G., & Olivetti, E. (2017) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03500 · Cited by 473
False authorship: an explorative case study around an AI-generated article published under my name
Spinellis, D. (2025) · Research Integrity and Peer Review · doi:10.1186/s41073-025-00165-z · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Lammey, R.
- Venue
- Insights the UKSG journal
- Publisher
- Ubiquity Press, Ltd.
- Published
- 2015-07-07
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 62-68
- ISSN
- 2048-7754
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
