Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why Women Stay: Understanding the Trauma Bond Between Victim and Abuser Case Studies Were Written

Hadeed, Linda·2021·Gender, Development and Social Change

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-73472-5_12

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Celani, David P. (1996). The illusion of love: What the battered woman returns to her abuser. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  2. Ffolkes, Suzanne. (1997). Violence against women: Some legal responses. In B. B. E. Leo-Rhynie, & C. Barrow (Ed.). Gender: A multi-disciplinary perspective. Kingston, UK: Ian Randle Publishers.
  3. Hadeed, Linda. (2006). Contributing factors to staying in abusive relationships: Afro-Trinidadian women in Trinidad and Tobago. The Caribbean Journal of Social Work, 5, 106–121.
  4. Zellerer, Evelyn. (2000). Domestic violence in Trinidad and Tobago: Some comments. Caribbean Journal of Criminology and Social Psychology, 51(1&2), 209–227.

Cited by

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Hadeed, L.
Affiliations
Walden University (US)
Corresponding author
Hadeed, Linda
Venue
Gender, Development and Social Change
Published
2021
Pages
195-207
ISSN
  • 2730-7328 (ISSN-L)
  • 2730-7336
OpenAlex
W3175857826
Cited by
3
References
13
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.72
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Gender, development and social change (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
intimate partner violence, staying in abusive relationships, object relations theory, childhood abuse, child neglect, abandonment, defense mechanisms, moral defense, personality development, women's decision-making, intervention guidelines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Women Stay: Understanding the Trauma Bond Between Victim and Abuser Case Studies Were Written. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-030-73472-5_12
The paper
Hadeed, L. (2021). Why Women Stay: Understanding the Trauma Bond Between Victim and Abuser Case Studies Were Written. Gender, Development and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73472-5_12

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.