The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Case Study Research: Principles and Practices
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology
Friedrichs, J., & Kratochwil, F. (2009) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818309990142 · Cited by 473
The Enduring Indispensability of the Controlled Comparison
Slater, D., & Ziblatt, D. (2013) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414012472469 · Cited by 332
Making the World Safe for Dictatorship
Dukalskis, A. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197520130.001.0001 · Cited by 151
A qualitative assessment of QCA: method stretching in large-N studies and temporality
(2022) · doi:10.1007/s11135-021-01278-5 · Cited by 35
Why Women Stay: Understanding the Trauma Bond Between Victim and Abuser Case Studies Were Written
Hadeed, L. (2021) · Gender, Development and Social Change · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-73472-5_12 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Stalp, M. C.
- Venue
- Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76-77
- ISSN
- 0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8638
- OpenAlex
- W1993773699
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 40.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/009430610803700146
- The paper
- Stalp, M. C. (2008). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1177/009430610803700146
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
