The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sample Size Calculations
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The sample size of N = 73 suffices to reach more than 80% power to detect at a significance level of 0.05 a difference of 30% in dropout rates during the first year between 20% and 50%.
“Moreover, the sample size of N = 73 suffices to reach more than 80% power to detect at a significance level of 0.05, a difference of 30% in dropout rates during the first year between 20% [which is the approximate dropout rate of ST in individual-group format at 1 year; (26)] and 50%, which would be a substantial and alarming increase in the experimental treatment (25, 28).”
From Timing of imagery rescripting during schema therapy for borderline personality disorder: the LUCY trial (2023) · cites this paper as [25]
The planned sample of at least N = 73 participants, with seven repeated measurements and an assumed average correlation of 0.5, provides 80% power to detect a medium effect size of d = 0.5 between treatment conditions.
“At least N = 73 participants were planned to be included. Using the approximation proposed by Twisk (25), and assuming an average correlation of 0.5 between measurements [as in (26)], this suffices, given the seven repeated measurements, to reach 80% power to detect a medium effect size of d = 0.5 between the treatment conditions.”
From Timing of imagery rescripting during schema therapy for borderline personality disorder: the LUCY trial (2023) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cites
Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis for Epidemiology: A Practical Guide
Twisk, J. W. R. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139342834 · Cited by 593
Self-citationStepped wedge designs could reduce the required sample size in cluster randomized trials
Woertman, W. H., Hoop, E. O., Moerbeek, M., Zuidema, S. U., Gerritsen, D. L., & Teerenstra, S. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.01.009 · Cited by 300
Sample size calculations for stepped wedge and cluster randomised trials: a unified approach
Hemming, K., & Taljaard, M. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.015 · Cited by 230
Sample size calculation for a stepped wedge trial
Baio, G., Copas, A., Ambler, G., Hargreaves, J., Beard, E., & Omar, R. Z. (2015) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0840-9 · Cited by 163
Twisk, J. W. R. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108635660 · Cited by 59
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Analysis of Data from Randomized Controlled Trials
Twisk, J. W. R. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81865-4 · Cited by 25
Self-citationKoppeschaar, A., Bachrach, N., & Arntz, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1204439 · Cited by 9
Chirwa, G. C., & Chiwaula, L. S. (2022) · Agrekon · doi:10.1080/03031853.2022.2095291 · Cited by 3
Change Management in a South African Municipality: Can it Work?
Mukheli, P. D., & Naidoo, V. (2023) · European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance (ECMLG) · doi:10.34190/ecmlg.19.1.1960 · Cited by 1
Walking in relation to participation after stroke; is virtual reality training of added value?
de Rooij, I. J. M. (2021) · doi:10.33540/975
Rong, C., Wu, Q., Ming, C., Yan, C., & Xie, R.-R. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4170426/v1
Metadata
- Authors
- Twisk, J. W. R.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Twisk, Jos W. R.
- ORCID
- Twisk, Jos W. R.
- Venue
- Analysis of Data from Randomized Controlled Trials
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2021
- Pages
- 151-155
- OpenAlex
- W4248797090
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 7.73
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- sample size determination, continuous outcomes, binary outcomes, clustered data, longitudinal study design, statistical power
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review