The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Collaborative Reflection Between Writer, Director and Actors: Table Read as Scriptwriting ‘Intervention’
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, existing studies often focus on isolated stages of the creative process, overlooking the complete workflow that integrates structured principles [65] and collaboration with stakeholders [9, 15, 99], both of which are essential to screenwriting.”
From Understanding Screenwriters' Practices, Attitudes, and Future Expectations in Human-AI Co-Creation (2025) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“These gaps stem from its unique characteristics, including audiovisual storytelling [86], structured principles [65], and multi-stakeholder collaboration [9, 15, 99].”
From Understanding Screenwriters' Practices, Attitudes, and Future Expectations in Human-AI Co-Creation (2025) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cites
Putting Transformative Learning Theory into Practice.
Christie, M., Carey, M. D., Robertson, A., & Grainger, P. (2015) · Cited by 229
Theoretical and pedagogical perspectives on orchestrating creativity and collaborative learning
Hämäläinen, R., & Vähäsantanen, K. (2011) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2011.08.001 · Cited by 215
An analysis of two models of reflection and their implications for educational development
Kreber *, C. (2004) · International Journal for Academic Development · doi:10.1080/1360144042000296044 · Cited by 182
Attardo, S. (2014) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483346175 · Cited by 145
Introduction: the pragmatics of humor
Attardo, S. (2003) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(02)00178-9 · Cited by 139
Adventures in the Screen Trade: A Personal View of Hollywood and Screenwriting
Goldman, W. (1983) · Futura eBooks · Cited by 126
Cvetkovic, V. B. (2015) · Reference Reviews · doi:10.1108/rr-12-2014-0344 · Cited by 81
Reclaiming authentic selves: Control, resistive humour and identity work in the office
Westwood, R. I., & Johnston, A. (2011) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508411422583 · Cited by 71
Fail Again, Fail Better: Embracing Failure as a Paradigm for Creative Learning in the Arts
Smith, S. F., & Henriksen, D. (2016) · Art Education · doi:10.1080/00043125.2016.1141644 · Cited by 52
Creativity: Delusions, Realities, Opportunities and Challenges
Steers, J. (2009) · International Journal of Art & Design Education · doi:10.1111/j.1476-8070.2009.01600.x · Cited by 47
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Schaefer, Z. A. (2014). Humor and small group research In S. I. Attardo (Ed.), Encylopedia of humor theory. Sage.
- Vorhaus, J. (1994). The comic toolbox: How to be funny even if you’re not (1st ed.). Silman-James Press.
- Vorhaus, J. (2012). The little book of sitcom. Bafflegab Books.
Cited by
Understanding Screenwriters' Practices, Attitudes, and Future Expectations in Human-AI Co-Creation
Tang, Y., Li, H., Lan, M., Ma, X., & Qu, H. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714120 · Cited by 18
“These gaps stem from its unique characteristics, including audiovisual story-telling [86], structured principles [65], and multi-stakeholder collaboration [9, 15, 99].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Cake, S.
- Affiliations
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Cake, Susan
- ORCID
- Cake, Susan
- Venue
- The Palgrave Handbook of Script Development
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2021
- Pages
- 425-436
- OpenAlex
- W4206570214
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 7.12
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- www.springer.com/tdm (vor)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Artistic and Creative Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cinema History and Criticism
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Theatre and Performance Studies
- Keywords
- screenwriting, script development, collaborative reflection, formative assessment, television comedy, creative process
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Collaborative Reflection Between Writer, Director and Actors: Table Read as Scriptwriting ‘Intervention’. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-030-82234-7_29
- The paper
- Cake, S. (2021). A Collaborative Reflection Between Writer, Director and Actors: Table Read as Scriptwriting ‘Intervention’. The Palgrave Handbook of Script Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82234-7_29
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
