The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theoretical and pedagogical perspectives on orchestrating creativity and collaborative learning
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
THE ROLE OF TUTORING IN PROBLEM SOLVING *
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x · Cited by 8,851
Guilford, J. P. (1950) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0063487 · Cited by 3,588
The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving.
Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995) · Computer Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5 · Cited by 2,274 · cited 3×
“The aim of this is for the activities that members of collaborative group engage in to be not individual activities, but rather interdependent group processes (e.g. interactions) attempting to come to a shared conception of a problem (Bereiter, 2002; Roschelle & Teasley, 1995).”
BackgroundMotivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do
Amabile, T. M. (1997) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41165921 · Cited by 2,243
Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups
Cohen, E. G. (1994) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543064001001 · Cited by 2,120
Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543069001021 · Cited by 1,943
Society, Culture, and Person: A Systems View of Creativity
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014) · The Systems Model of Creativity · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7_4 · Cited by 1,289
Education and mind in the knowledge age
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-2294 · Cited by 1,266
Peer interaction and learning in small groups
Webb, N. M. (1989) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1 · Cited by 1,050
Cited by
What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work
Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001 · Cited by 934
Self-citationMolinillo, S., Aguilar-Illescas, R., Anaya-Sánchez, R., & Vallespín-Arán, M. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.012 · Cited by 303
Care, Communication, Support: Core for Designing Meaningful Online Collaborative Learning
Robinson, H. A., Kilgore, W., & Warren, S. J. (2017) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v21i4.1240 · Cited by 89
Guiding collaborative revision of science explanations
Gerard, L., Kidron, A., & Linn, M. C. (2019) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-019-09298-y · Cited by 58
Exploring cognitive strategies in human-AI interaction: ChatGPT's role in creative tasks
Boers, J., Etty, T., Baars, M., & van Broekhoven, K. (2025) · Journal of Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.yjoc.2025.100095 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Hämäläinen, R., & Vähäsantanen, K.
- Venue
- Educational Research Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 169-184
- ISSN
- 1747-938X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2106451027
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 19.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theoretical and pedagogical perspectives on orchestrating creativity and collaborative learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.edurev.2011.08.001
- The paper
- Hämäläinen, R., & Vähäsantanen, K. (2011). Theoretical and pedagogical perspectives on orchestrating creativity and collaborative learning. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2011.08.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
