Cited by 28AI in cancer detectionDigital Imaging for Blood DiseasesBiological Stains and Phytochemicals

Contrastive Learning Based Stain Normalization Across Multiple Tumor in Histopathology

Ke, Jing, Shen, Yiqing, Liang, Xiaoyao, Shen, Dinggang·2021·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-87237-3_55

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ke, J., Shen, Y., Liang, X., & Shen, D.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • ShanghaiTech University (CN)
Corresponding author
Shen, Yiqing
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2021
Pages
571-580
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W3202902586
Cited by
28
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.08
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Biological Stains and Phytochemicals
Keywords
contrastive learning, color normalization, H&E staining, histopathological images, generative adversarial networks, self-supervised learning, tumor histology, histology image classification, mode collapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review