The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinically Correct Report Generation from Chest X-Rays Using Templates
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The application of AI to image interpretation tasks has often been limited to the identification of a handful of individual pathologies, representing an over-simplification of the image interpretation task.
“However, the application of AI to image interpretation tasks has often been limited to the identification of a handful of individual pathologies,8,9,10 representing an over-simplification of the image interpretation task.”
From Evaluating progress in automatic chest X-ray radiology report generation (2023) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Generating Radiology Reports via Memory-driven Transformer
Chen, Z., Song, Y., Chang, T.-H., & Wan, X. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.112 · Cited by 693
On the Automatic Generation of Medical Imaging Reports
Jing, B., Xie, P., & Xing, E. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1240 · Cited by 657 · cited 5×
“Most works use common Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) as encoder (e.g. Densenet [6]), and as decoder: a single LSTM to generate word by word [2]; two LSTMs arranged hierarchically to generate sentences and words [9,10,16,31]; or a Transformer-based network [3,17,29].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialA Structured Review of the Validity of BLEU
Reiter, E. (2018) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00322 · Cited by 386
MIMIC-CXR-JPG - chest radiographs with structured labels
Johnson, A., Lungren, M., Peng, Y., Lu, Z., Mark, R., Berkowitz, S., & Horng, S. (2024) · PhysioNet · doi:10.13026/8360-t248 · Cited by 46
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Biswal, S., Xiao, C., Glass, L.M., Westover, B., Sun, J.: Clara: clinical report auto-completion. In: The Web Conference (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3366423.3380137 · DOI
- Boag, W., Hsu, T.M.H., Mcdermott, M., Berner, G., Alesentzer, E., Szolovits, P.: Baselines for chest X-ray report generation. In: ML4H at NeurIPS (2020)
- Demner-Fushman, D., et al.: Preparing a collection of radiology examinations for distribution and retrieval. JAMIA (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv080 · DOI · Paper page
- Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., Weinberger, K.Q.: Densely connected convolutional networks. In: CVPR (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.243 · DOI · Paper page
- Huang, X., Yan, F., Xu, W., Li, M.: Multi-attention and incorporating background information model for chest x-ray image report generation. IEEE Access (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2947134 · DOI
- Irvin, J., et al.: CheXpert: a large chest radiograph dataset with uncertainty labels and expert comparison. In: AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2019). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.3301590 · DOI · Paper page
- Jing, B., Wang, Z., Xing, E.: Show, describe and conclude: on exploiting the structure information of chest x-ray reports. In: ACL (2019). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1657 · DOI
- Johnson, A.E.W., et al.: MIMIC-CXR, a de-identified publicly available database of chest radiographs with free-text reports. Sci. Data (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0322-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Kougia, V., Pavlopoulos, J., Papapetrou, P., Gordon, M.: RTEX: a novel framework for ranking, tagging, and explanatory diagnostic captioning of radiography exams. JAMIA (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocab046 · DOI
- Li, C.Y., Liang, X., Hu, Z., Xing, E.P.: Knowledge-driven encode, retrieve, paraphrase for medical image report generation. In: AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2019). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33016666 · DOI
- Lovelace, J., Mortazavi, B.: Learning to generate clinically coherent chest X-ray reports. In: EMNLP (2020). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.110 · DOI
- Mathur, N., Baldwin, T., Cohn, T.: Tangled up in BLEU: Reevaluating the evaluation of automatic machine translation evaluation metrics. In: ACL (2020). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.448 · DOI
- Ni, J., Hsu, C.N., Gentili, A., McAuley, J.: Learning visual-semantic embeddings for reporting abnormal findings on chest X-rays. In: EMNLP (2020). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.176 · DOI
- Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., Zhu, W.J.: BLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In: ACL (2002). https://doi.org/10.3115/1073083.1073135 · DOI · Paper page
- Pino, P., Parra, D., Messina, P., Besa, C., Uribe, S.: Inspecting state of the art performance and NLP metrics in image-based medical report generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.09257 (2020). In LXAI at NeurIPS 2020 · DOI
- Reyes, M., et al.: On the interpretability of artificial intelligence in radiology: Challenges and opportunities. Radiol. Artif. Intell. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.2020190043 · DOI · Paper page
- Selvaraju, R.R., Cogswell, M., Das, A., Vedantam, R., Parikh, D., Batra, D.: Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In: ICCV, pp. 618–626 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2017.74 · DOI · Paper page
- Syeda-Mahmood, T., et al.: Chest X-ray report generation through fine-grained label learning. In: Martel, A.L., et al. (eds.) MICCAI 2020. LNCS, vol. 12262, pp. 561–571. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59713-9_54 · DOI
- Vedantam, R., Lawrence Zitnick, C., Parikh, D.: CIDEr: consensus-based image description evaluation. In: CVPR (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2015.7299087 · DOI · Paper page
- Xiong, Y., Du, B., Yan, P.: Reinforced transformer for medical image captioning. In: MLMI (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32692-0_77 · DOI
- Xue, Y., et al.: Multimodal recurrent model with attention for automated radiology report generation. In: Frangi, A.F., Schnabel, J.A., Davatzikos, C., Alberola-López, C., Fichtinger, G. (eds.) MICCAI 2018. LNCS, vol. 11070, pp. 457–466. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00928-1_52 · DOI
- Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Xu, Z., Yu, Q., Yuille, A., Xu, D.: When radiology report generation meets knowledge graph. In: AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2020). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i07.6989 · DOI
- Zhang, Y., Ding, D.Y., Qian, T., Manning, C.D., Langlotz, C.P.: Learning to summarize radiology findings. In: LOUHI at NeurIPS (2018). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-5623 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluating progress in automatic chest X-ray radiology report generation
Yu, F., Endo, M., Krishnan, R., Pan, I., Tsai, A., Reis, E. P., Fonseca, E. K. U. N., Lee, H. M. H., Abad, Z. S. H., Ng, A. Y., et al. (2023) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2023.100802 · Cited by 200
Deep learning for report generation on chest X-ray images
Ouis, M. Y., & A. Akhloufi, M. (2024) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2023.102320 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Pino, P., Parra, D., Besa, C., & Lagos, C.
- Affiliations
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
- Corresponding author
- Pino, Pablo
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2021
- Pages
- 654-663
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W3204650824
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Keywords
- chest X-ray report generation, anomaly detection, verbalization, CheXpert, MIMIC-CXR
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review