Cited by 657Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

On the Automatic Generation of Medical Imaging Reports

Open access
Jing, Baoyu, Xie, Pengtao, Xing, Eric·2018·Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Abstract

Medical imaging is widely used in clinical practice for diagnosis and treatment.Report-writing can be error-prone for unexperienced physicians, and timeconsuming and tedious for experienced physicians.To address these issues, we study the automatic generation of medical imaging reports.This task presents several challenges.First, a complete report contains multiple heterogeneous forms of information, including findings and tags.Second, abnormal regions in medical images are difficult to identify.Third, the reports are typically long, containing multiple sentences.To cope with these challenges, we (1) build a multi-task learning framework which jointly performs the prediction of tags and the generation of paragraphs, (2) propose a co-attention mechanism to localize regions containing abnormalities and generate narrations for them, (3) develop a hierarchical LSTM model to generate long paragraphs.We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods on two publicly available datasets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/p18-1240

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deep learning methods have been used for automated generation of radiology reports, typically incorporating LSTM network models to generate textual paragraphs, and to identify findings in radiology reports.

    “Recently, deep learning methods have also been used for automated generation of radiology reports , typically incorporating long-short-term-memory (LSTM) network models to generate the textual paragraphs [314, 315, 316, 317], and also to identify findings in radiology reports [318, 319, 320].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Jimmy Ba, Volodymyr Mnih, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. 2015. Multiple object recognition with visual atten- tion. ICLR.
  2. Chin-Yew Lin. 2004. Rouge: A package for auto- matic evaluation of summaries. In Text summariza- tion branches out: Proceedings of the ACL-04 work- shop, volume 8. Barcelona, Spain.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jing, B., Xie, P., & Xing, E.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Published
2018
Pages
2577-2586
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2770165365
Cited by
657
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 123 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 11
FWCI
12.69
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
multi-task learning, co-attention, hierarchical LSTM, tag prediction, clinical report writing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review