Cited by 7Green IT and SustainabilityEnergy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesEnergy Efficiency in Computing

Rebound Effects in Methods of Artificial Intelligence

Willenbacher, Martina, Hornauer, Torsten, Wohlgemuth, Volker·2022·Progress in IS

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-88063-7_5

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 16 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willenbacher, M., Hornauer, T., & Wohlgemuth, V.
Affiliations
  • Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
  • HTW Berlin - University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Corresponding author
Willenbacher, Martina
Venue
Progress in IS
Published
2021-12-11
Pages
73-85
ISSN
  • 2196-8705 (ISSN-L)
  • 2196-8713
OpenAlex
W4200395034
Cited by
7
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in IS (publishedVersion)
  • Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Energy Efficiency in Computing
Keywords
rebound effect, artificial intelligence, energy consumption, CO2 emissions, energy efficiency, sustainability, digitalization, energy conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review