Artificial Intelligence Between Oppression and Resistance: Black Feminist Perspectives on Emerging Technologies
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This extraction is a form of digital colonialism that has implications for the environment.
“This is a form of digital colonialism that has implications for the environment.”
From Fostering AI Literacy in Undergraduates: A ChatGPT Workshop Case Study (2025) · cites this paper as Schelenz 2022
Extraction causes political and societal upheavals that can trigger violations of human rights, starvation, and genocide.
“This extraction causes political and societal upheavals that can trigger violations of human rights, starvation, and genocide (Schelenz 2022).”
From Fostering AI Literacy in Undergraduates: A ChatGPT Workshop Case Study (2025) · cites this paper as Schelenz 2022
Cites
Jackson, S. J., Bailey, M., & Foucault Welles, B. (2020) · MIT Press · doi:10.7551/mitpress/10858.001.0001 · Cited by 634 · see citing works
Towards a critical race methodology in algorithmic fairness
Hanna, A., Denton, R., Smart, A., & Smith-Loud, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372826 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Bias in Online Freelance Marketplaces: Evidence from TaskRabbit and Fiverr
Hannák, A., Wagner, C., Garcia, D., Mislove, A., Strohmaier, M., & Wilson, C. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing · doi:10.1145/2998181.2998327 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Cave, S., & Dihal, K. (2020) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-020-00415-6 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fostering AI Literacy in Undergraduates: A ChatGPT Workshop Case Study
Archambault, S. G., Murph, N. L., & Ramachandran, S. (2025) · Library Trends · doi:10.1353/lib.2025.a968491 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schelenz, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Tübingen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schelenz, Laura
- ORCID
- Schelenz, Laura
- Venue
- Social and Cultural Studies of Robots and AI
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2022
- Pages
- 225-249
- ISSN
- 2523-8523 (ISSN-L)
- 2523-8531
- OpenAlex
- W4210771781
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 13.38
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social and cultural studies of robots and AI (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality
- Keywords
- Black feminism, artificial intelligence, algorithmic oppression, design justice, social justice, emerging technologies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
