The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Future-Proof Web Authentication: Bring Your Own FIDO2 Extensions
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“FIDO defines stringent biometric performance requirements that a FIDO-certified authenticator needs to adhere to [5], while prior work has shown that knowledge-based factors such as PINs can often be observed or easily guessed [66], such as by malware on the device.”
From Evaluating the Security Posture of Real-World FIDO2 Deployments (2023) · cites this paper as [66]
Citations
Cites
The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2
Dierks, T., & Rescorla, E. (2008) · doi:10.17487/rfc5246 · Cited by 1,576
Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile
Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S., Housley, R., & Polk, W. (2008) · doi:10.17487/rfc5280 · Cited by 1,075
Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions
Eastlake, D. (2011) · doi:10.17487/rfc6066 · Cited by 189
Ghorbani Lyastani, S., Schilling, M., Neumayr, M., Backes, M., & Bugiel, S. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp40000.2020.00047 · Cited by 128
Asynchronous Remote Key Generation: An Analysis of Yubico's Proposal for W3C WebAuthn
Frymann, N., Gardham, D., Kiefer, F., Lundberg, E., Manulis, M., & Nilsson, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3372297.3417292 · Cited by 31
Registries for Web Authentication (WebAuthn)
Hodges, J., Mandyam, G. D., & Jones, M. B. (2020) · doi:10.17487/rfc8809 · Cited by 2
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Ciolino, S., Parkin, S., Dunphy, P.: Of two minds about two-factor: understanding everyday FIDO U2F usability through device comparison and experience sampling. In: Fifteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2019), pp. 339–356. USENIX Association, Santa Clara, August 2019
- Farke, F.M., Lorenz, L., Schnitzler, T., Markert, P., Dürmuth, M.: “You still use the password after all" – exploring FIDO2 security keys in a small company. In: Sixteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2020), pp. 19–35. USENIX Association, August 2020
Cited by
Evaluating the Security Posture of Real-World FIDO2 Deployments
Kuchhal, D., Saad, M., Oest, A., & Li, F. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3576915.3623063 · Cited by 22
“FIDO2 defines an extensible extension interface, which allows one to define custom extensions based on a specific use-case [71].”
BackgroundMethodHow many FIDO protocols are needed? Analysing the technology, security and compliance
Angelogianni, A., Politis, I., & Xenakis, C. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3654661 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Putz, F., Schön, S., & Hollick, M.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Putz, Florentin
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2021
- Pages
- 17-32
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W4205651683
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 0.83
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- www.springer.com/tdm (vor)
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
- Keywords
- FIDO2, web authentication, strong authentication, chromium, hardware tokens
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Future-Proof Web Authentication: Bring Your Own FIDO2 Extensions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-030-93747-8_2
- The paper
- Putz, F., Schön, S., & Hollick, M. (2021). Future-Proof Web Authentication: Bring Your Own FIDO2 Extensions. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93747-8_2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
