Cited by 8Literacy, Media, and EducationEnglish Language Learning and TeachingEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

A Design-Driven Approach to Language Teacher Education in the Era of Digitalization

Tumelius, Riikka, Kuure, Leena, Riekki, Maritta·2022·Arctic Encounters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-99104-3_2

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tumelius, R., Kuure, L., & Riekki, M.
Affiliations
University of Oulu (FI)
Corresponding author
Tumelius, Riikka
Venue
Arctic Encounters
Published
2022
Pages
19-40
ISSN
  • 2730-6488 (ISSN-L)
  • 2730-6496
OpenAlex
W4285295868
Cited by
8
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5
FWCI
50.38
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Arctic encounters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
language teacher education, pre-service teachers, design-based approach, digitalization of education, English language teaching, multimodal practices, teacher-led learning, northern Finland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review