Cited by 542Language, Discourse, Communication StrategiesLinguistic and Sociocultural StudiesMultilingual Education and Policy

Language Ecology in Multilingual Settings. Towards a Theory of Symbolic Competence

Kramsch, C., Whiteside, A.·2008·Applied Linguistics

Abstract

This paper draws on complexity theory and post-modern sociolinguistics to explore how an ecological approach to language data can illuminate aspects of language use in multilingual environments. We first examine transcripts of exchanges taking place among multilingual individuals in multicultural settings. We briefly review what conversation and discourse analysis can explain about these exchanges. We then build on these analyses, using insights from complexity theory and interactional sociolinguistics. We finally outline the components of a competence in multilingual encounters that has not been sufficiently taken into consideration by applied linguists and that we call ‘symbolic competence’.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/applin/amn022

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kramsch and Whiteside used a complexity theory framework to show that Yucatec Maya immigrants and Asian shop owners operated on multiple timescales and positioned themselves subjectively rather than performing expected identities.

    “For example, Kramsch and Whiteside (2008), using a complexity theory framework, examined the exchanges between Yucatec Maya immigrants and Asian shop owners in the Hispanic district of San Francisco and showed that, rather than performing expected linguistic and cultural identities, these immigrants operated on multiple timescales and positioned themselves subjectively in multiple ways so as to get along with others and avoid the police.”

    From Language and Culture (2014) · cites this paper as Kramsch and Whiteside (2008)

  • Kramsch and Whiteside showed that Yucatec Maya immigrants and Asian shop owners in San Francisco, rather than performing expected linguistic and cultural identities, operated on multiple timescales and positioned themselves subjectively in multiple ways to get along with others and avoid the police.

    “For example, Kramsch and Whiteside (2008), using a complexity theory framework, examined the exchanges between Yucatec Maya immigrants and Asian shop owners in the Hispanic district of San Francisco and showed that, rather than performing expected linguistic and cultural identities, these immigrants operated on multiple timescales and positioned themselves subjectively in multiple ways so as to”

    From Language and Culture (2014) · cites this paper as Kramsch and Whiteside (2008)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 13 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kramsch, C., & Whiteside, A.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Applied Linguistics
Published
2008-01-10
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
645-671
ISSN
  • 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-450X
OpenAlex
W2004875992
Cited by
542
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 20
FWCI
142.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
Keywords
language ecology, multilingualism, symbolic competence, complexity theory, interactional sociolinguistics, conversation analysis, discourse analysis, multicultural settings, language use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review