CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8Innovative Human-Technology InteractionUsability and User Interface DesignDigital Games and Media

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Targeting IMPACT: A New Psychological Model of User Experience

Open access
Kurta, Leah, Freeman, Jonathan·2022·Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-05637-6_12
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-05637-6_12

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Abeele, V.V., Spiel, K., Nacke, L., Johnson, D., Gerling, K.: Development and validation of the player experience inventory: a scale to measure player experiences at the level of functional and psychosocial consequences. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 135, 102370 (2020) · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bartle, R.: Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: players who suit MUDs. J. MUD Res. 1(1), 19 (1996)
  3. Berlyne, D.E.: Aesthetics and psychobiology. J. Aesthetics Art Criticism 31(4) (1973) · DOI
  4. Bowman, N.D., Weber, R., Tamborini, R., Sherry, J.: Facilitating game play: how others affect performance at and enjoyment of video games. Media Psychol. 16(1), 39–64 (2013) · DOI
  5. Brown, A., Ratzkin, R.: Making sense of audience engagement. San Francisco Foundation 1, 78 (2011)
  6. Coelho, C., Tichon, J.G., Hine, T.J., Wallis, G.M., Riva, G.: Media presence and inner presence: the sense of presence in virtual reality technologies. In: From Communication to Presence: Cognition, Emotions and Culture Towards the Ultimate Communicative Experience, pp. 25–45. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)
  7. Cohen, L.B., Gelber, E.R.: Infant visual memory. In: Cohen, L.B., Salapatek, P. (eds.) Infant Perception: From Sensation to Cognition, vol. 1, pp. 347–403. Academic Press, London (1975) · DOI
  8. Desimone, R., Duncan, J.: Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18(1), 193–222 (1995) · DOI · Paper page
  9. Eyal, N.: Hooked: How to Build Habit-forming Products. Penguin (2014)
  10. Eshel, N., Tian, J., Bukwich, M., Uchida, N.: Dopamine neurons share common response function for reward prediction error. Nat. Neurosci. 19(3), 479–486 (2016) · DOI
  11. Fantz, R.L.: Visual experience in infants: decreased attention to familiar patterns relative to novel ones. Science 146, 668–670 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.146.3644.668 · DOI
  12. Ferster, C.B., Skinner, B.F.: Schedules of reinforcement. Appleton-Century-Crofts (1957). https://doi.org/10.1037/10627-000 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Fortes Tondello, G., Wehbe, R.R., Diamond, L., Busch, M., Marczewski, A., Nacke, L.: The gamification user types Hexad scale. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, pp. 229–243 (2016) · DOI
  14. Freeman, J.: Implications for the measurement of presence from convergent evidence on the structure of presence. In: Presence at ICA 2004 – Proceedings. https://ispr.info/presence-conferences/previous-conferences/presence-at-ica-2004-proceedings/ (2004)
  15. Hassenzahl, M.: The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Hum.-Comput. Interaction 19(4), 319–349 (2004) · DOI
  16. Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience – a research agenda. Behav. Inform. Technol. 25(2), 91–97 (2006) · DOI
  17. Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., Zubek, R.: MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1722 (July 2004)
  18. IJsselsteijn, W., De Kort, Y., Poels, K., Jurgelionis, A., Bellotti, F.: Characterising and measuring user experiences in digital games. In: International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, vol. 2, p. 27 (June 2007)
  19. Jetter, C., Gerken, J.: A simplified model of user experience for practical application. In: The 2nd COST294-MAUSE International Open Workshop “User Experience-Towards a Unified View”, NordiCHI 2006, Oslo, pp. 106–111 (2007)
  20. Johnson, D., Gardner, M.J., Perry, R.: Validation of two game experience scales: the player experience of need satisfaction (PENS) and game experience questionnaire (GEQ). Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 118, 38–46 (2018) · DOI
  21. Johnston, W.A., Hawley, K.J., Plewe, S.H., Elliott, J.M., DeWitt, M.J.: Attention capture by novel stimuli. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 119(4), 397 (1990) · DOI
  22. Law, E.L.C., Van Schaik, P., Roto, V.: Attitudes towards user experience (UX) measurement. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 72(6), 526–541 (2014) · DOI
  23. Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., Keogh, E., Davidoff, J.: A cross-media presence questionnaire: the ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 10(3), 282–297 (2001) · DOI · Paper page
  24. Lorenz, M., et al.: Presence and user experience in a virtual environment under the influence of ethanol: an explorative study. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 1–16 (2018) · DOI
  25. Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic books
  26. Pashler, H., Dobkins, K., Huang, L.: Is contrast just another feature for visual selective attention? Vis. Res. 44(12), 1403–1410 (2004) · DOI
  27. Rousi, R., Sariluoma, P., Leikas, J.: Unpacking the contents – a conceptual model for understanding user experience in user psychology. In: Proceedings of ACHI 2011: The Fourth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions. Guadeloupe, FR, 23–28 Feb. 2011, pp. 28–34 (2011)
  28. Rozin, P., Rozin, A., Appel, B., Wachtel, C.: Documenting and explaining the common AAB pattern in music and humor: establishing and breaking expectations. Emotion 6(3), 349 (2006) · DOI
  29. Ryan, R.M., Rigby, C.S., Przybylski, A.: The motivational pull of video games: a self-determination theory approach. Motiv. Emot. 30(4), 344–360 (2006) · DOI · Paper page
  30. Sander, D., Nummenmaa, L.: Reward and emotion: an affective neuroscience approach. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 39, 161–167 (2021) · DOI
  31. Shin, D.: How do users experience the interaction with an immersive screen? Comput. Hum. Behav. 98, 302–310 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.010 · DOI
  32. Søraker, J.H.: Gaming the gamer? The ethics of exploiting psychological research in video games. J. Inform. Commun. Ethics Soc. (2016) · DOI
  33. Steuer, J.: Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. J. Commun. 42(4), 73–93 (1992) · DOI · Paper page
  34. Treisman, A.M.: Selective attention in man. Br. Med. Bull. 20(1), 12–16 (1964) · DOI
  35. Vorderer, P., Hartmann, T., Klimmt, C. Explaining the enjoyment of playing video games: the role of competition. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Entertainment Computing, pp. 1–9 (May 2003)
  36. Walton-Pattison, E., Dombrowski, S.U., Presseau, J.: ‘Just one more episode’: Frequency and theoretical correlates of television binge watching. J. Health Psychol. 23(1), 17–24 (2018) · DOI
  37. Waterworth, E.L., Waterworth, J.A.: Focus, locus, and sensus: the three dimensions of virtual experience. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 4(2), 203–213 (2001) · DOI
  38. Wickens, C.D., McCarley, J.S.: Applied Attention Theory. CRC Press (2019) · DOI
  39. Wu, H., Cai, T., Luo, D., Liu, Y., Zhang, Z.: Immersive virtual reality news: a study of user experience and media effects. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 147 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102576 · DOI
  40. Yee, N.: Motivations for play in online games. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 9, 772–775 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.772 · DOI
  41. Zajonc, R.B.: Social facilitation. Science 149, 269–275 (1965) · DOI · Paper page
  42. Zajonc, R.B.: Compresence. In: Paulus, P.B. (eds.) Psychology of Group Influence, pp. 35–60. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1980)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 8

Metadata

Authors
Kurta, L., & Freeman, J.
Affiliations
Goldsmiths University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Kurta, Leah
ORCID
Freeman, Jonathan
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2022
Pages
196-212
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-05637-6_12
OpenAlex
W4285267574
Cited by
8
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.35
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • Goldsmiths (University of London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
Keywords
user experience, IMPACT model, technology and society, user journey, gameplay, enjoyment, personalization, emotional experience, user-centered design, user experience evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Targeting IMPACT: A New Psychological Model of User Experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-031-05637-6_12
The paper
Kurta, L., & Freeman, J. (2022). Targeting IMPACT: A New Psychological Model of User Experience. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05637-6_12