Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

User Experience Requirements of Digital Moderation Systems in South Africa: Using Participatory Design Within Design Science Research

Rajamany, V., van Biljon, J. A., van Staden, C. J.·2022·Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-06516-3_35
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-06516-3_35

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Bausili, A.V.: From piloting e-submission to electronic management of assessment (EMA): mapping grading journeys. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 49(3), 463–478 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12547 · DOI
  2. Colbert, P., Wyatt-Smith, C., Klenowski, V.: A systems-level approach to building sustainable assessment cultures: moderation, quality task design and dependability of judgement. Policy Futur. Educ. 10(4), 386–401 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2012.10.4.386 · doi:10.2304/pfie.2012.10.4.386
  3. Van Staden, C., Kroeze, J., Van Biljon, J.: Digital Transformation for a Sustainable Society in the 21st Century, vol. 11701. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29374-1 · DOI
  4. SAQA. National Policy and Criteria for Designing and Implementing. Saqa 1, 26 (2015)
  5. Ivanova, M., Durcheva, M., Baneres, D., Rodriguez, M.E.: eAssessment by using a trustworthy system in blended and online institutions. In: 2018 17th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, ITHET 2018, pp. 1–7 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHET.2018.8424805 · doi:10.1109/ithet.2018.8424805
  6. Bejinaru, R.: Impact of digitalization on education in the knowledge economy. Manag. Dyn. Knowl. Econ. 7(3), 367–380 (2019). https://doi.org/10.25019/MDKE/7.3.06 · doi:10.25019/mdke/7.3.06
  7. March, S., Smith, G.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decis. Support Syst. 15, 251–266 (1995) · DOI · Paper page
  8. Davies, I., Green, P., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., Gallo, S.: How do practitioners use conceptual modeling in practice? Data Knowl. Eng. 58(3), 358–380 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2005.07.007 · DOI
  9. Grant, M.J., Booth, A.: A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info. Libr. J. 26(2), 91–108 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. Cavacini, A.: What is the best database for computer science journal articles? Scientometrics 102(3), 2059–2071 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1506-1 · DOI
  11. Berger, D.: Supporting Tool for Moderation in the Grading Process of Summative Assessments. Graz University of Technology Masters Thesis (2011)
  12. Rajamany, V., Van Biljon, J., Van Staden, C.: eModeration adoption requirements for secondary school education: a critical literature review. IEEE 10(1109), 1–6 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ictas47918.2020.233979 · DOI
  13. Van Staden, C.: User experience evaluation of electronic moderation systems: a case study at a private higher education institution in South Africa. Doctoral Dissertation, School of Computing, University of South Africa (2017)
  14. Rajamany, V., Van Staden, C.J., van Biljon, J.: Requirements for an eModeration system in private schools in South Africa. In: Hattingh, M., Matthee, M., Smuts, H., Pappas, I., Dwivedi, Y.K., Mäntymäki, M. (eds.) I3E 2020. LNCS, vol. 12066, pp. 557–568. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44999-5_46 · DOI
  15. Johnson, M., Greatorex, J.: Judging text presented on screen: implications for validity. e-Learning 5(1), 40–50 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2008.5.1.40 · doi:10.2304/elea.2008.5.1.40
  16. Rajamany, V.: eModeration Requirements: A Case Study in Private Secondary Schools in South Africa. Masters Dissertation, School of Computing, University of South Africa (2020) · DOI
  17. Newhouse, C.: Digital portfolios for summative assessment. In: ACEC2014 Now It’s Personal, pp. 1–8 (2014)
  18. Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S.: Design science research in information systems, pp. 9–22 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5653-8_2 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Vaishnavi, V., Kuechler, W., Petter, S.: Design science research in information systems. In: DESRIST, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 1–9 (2017). http://www.desrist.org/design-research-in-information-systems/
  20. Goldkuhl, G., Ågerfalk, P., Sjostrom, J.: A design science approach to information systems education. In: Maedche, A., vom Brocke, J., Hevner, A. (eds.) DESRIST 2017, LNCS, vol. 10243, pp. 383–397. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59144-5 · DOI
  21. Drechsler, A., Hevner, A.: A four-cycle model of IS design science research: capturing the dynamic nature of IS artifact design. In: Breakthroughs and Emerging Insights from Ongoing Design Science Projects: Research-in-progress papers and poster presentations from the 11th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, pp. 1–8 (2016). https://cora.ucc.ie/handle/10468/2560
  22. Otto, B., Oesterle, H.: Principles for knowledge creation in collaborative design science research. In: Thirty Third International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1–17 (2012)
  23. Clemensen, J., Rothmann, M.J., Smith, A.C., Caffery, L.J., Danbjorg, D.B.: Participatory design methods in telemedicine research. J. Telemed. Telecare 23(9), 780–785 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X16686747 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Spinuzzi, C.: The methodology of participatory design. Tech. Commmun. 52(2), 163–174 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2015.0028 · DOI
  25. Robertson, T., Simonsen, J.: Challenges and opportunities in contemporary participatory design. Des. Issues 28(3), 3–9 (2012) · DOI · Paper page
  26. Wanick, V., Bitelo, C.: Exploring the use of participatory design in game design: a Brazilian perspective. Int. J. Serious Games 7(3), 3–20 (2020) · DOI
  27. Wickson, F., Carew, A.L., Russell, A.W.: Transdisciplinary research: characteristics, quandaries and quality. Futures 38, 1046–1059 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.02.011 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Van der Merwe, A., Gerber, A., Smuts, H.: Guidelines for conducting design science research in information systems. SACLA 5(4), 1–17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.17150/2308-6203.2016.5(4).689-697 · doi:10.17150/2308-6203.2016.5(4).689-697
  29. Etikan, I., Musa, S., Alkassim, R.: Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat. 5(1), 1–4 (2016). https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Greatorex, J.: Moderated e-portfolio project evaluation. Cambridge (2004)
  31. Adie, L.: An investigation into online moderation. Assess. Matters 3, 5–27 (2011). http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=515662774994571;res=IELHSS · doi:10.18296/am.0088
  32. Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience - a research agenda. Behav. Inf. Technol. 25(2), 91–97 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500330331 · DOI

Cited by

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
Rajamany, V., van Biljon, J. A., & van Staden, C. J.
ORCID
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2022
Pages
470-482
ISSN
  • 0302-9743
  • 1611-3349
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-06516-3_35
Cited by
2
References
2
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: User Experience Requirements of Digital Moderation Systems in South Africa: Using Participatory Design Within Design Science Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-031-06516-3_35
The paper
Rajamany, V., van Biljon, J. A., & van Staden, C. J. (2022). User Experience Requirements of Digital Moderation Systems in South Africa: Using Participatory Design Within Design Science Research. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06516-3_35

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.