Transdisciplinary research: characteristics, quandaries and quality
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Methodologies in transdisciplinary research typically evolve in time.
“The methodologies also typically evolve in time (Wickson et al., 2006).”
From Educational Participatory Design in the Crossroads of Histories and Practices – Aiming for Digital Transformation in Language Pedagogy (2023) · cites this paper as Wickson et al., 2006
Cites
Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: the case of urban studies
Ramadier, T. (2004) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.009 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
The Potential of Transdisciplinarity
Gibbons, M., & Nowotny, H. (2001) · Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society · doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-8419-8_7 · Cited by 250 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In the social context, calls for interaction with an increasingly engaged populace [1,6,7] are driving research in more participatory, consultative and deliberate directions [5,8].”
BackgroundLiving on the border: knowledge, risk and transdisciplinarity
Horlick-Jones, T., & Sime, J. (2004) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.006 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Systemic Framework for Sustainability Assessment
Sala, S., Ciuffo, B., & Nijkamp, P. (2015) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015 · Cited by 743 · see citing works
Scholz, R. W., & Steiner, G. (2015) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-015-0327-3 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Zscheischler, J., & Rogga, S. (2015) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.005 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
de Jong, S. P. L., Wardenaar, T., & Horlings, E. (2016) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.008 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Robbins, C. A., Du, X., Bradley, T. H., Quinn, J. C., Bandhauer, T. M., Conrad, S. A., Carlson, K. H., & Tong, T. (2022) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106011 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Engineering Transdisciplinarity in University Academic Affairs: Challenges, Dilemmas, and Progress
Hyun, E. (2012) · Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science · doi:10.22545/2012/00027 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Kinnula, M., Iivari, N., Kuure, L., & Molin-Juustila, T. (2023) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-023-09473-8 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Transdisciplinarity in research can be seen in problem focus, methodology, and collaboration (Wickson et al., 2006).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
- Authors
- Wickson, F., Carew, A. L., & Russell, A. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Wollongong (AU)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Wickson, F.
- Venue
- Futures
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1046-1059
- ISSN
- 0016-3287 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168723631
- Cited by
- 613
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 29.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Futures (publishedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Keywords
- transdisciplinary research, research quality assessment, research integration, collaboration, strategic questioning, quality framework, knowledge production, research paradigms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
