Understanding Cybersecurity Law in Data Sovereignty and Digital Governance: An Overview from a Legal Perspective
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Human Value Alignment concentrates on harmonizing AI models with human ethics and values to ensure decisions and actions mirror societal norms and ethical standards, involving integration of ethical decision-making and adaptation of AI outputs to conform with human moral values.
“This emerging aspect concentrates on harmonizing AI models with human ethics and values to ensure that their decisions and actions mirror societal norms and ethical standards, involving the integration of ethical decision-making processes and the adaptation of AI outputs to conform with human moral values [265], [89], [266].”
From From Google Gemini to OpenAI Q* (Q-Star): A Survey on Reshaping the Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Research Landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [266]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McIntosh, T. R., Susnjak, T., Liu, T., Watters, P., Xu, D., Liu, D., & Halgamuge, M. N. (2025) · Technologies · doi:10.3390/technologies13020051 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lukings, M., & Habibi Lashkari, A.
- Affiliations
- York University (CA)
- Venue
- Progress in IS
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2196-8705 (ISSN-L)
- 2196-8713
- OpenAlex
- W4312391711
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 8.56
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Progress in IS (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
- Keywords
- cybersecurity law, data sovereignty, digital governance, legal framework, data protection, data governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
