Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sound as an Interface, Methods to Evaluate Voice User Interface (VUI) Experiences in Various Contexts

Cackett, Megan, Fulton, Laura, Pearl, David·2023·Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-18458-1_9

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Shashank, A., Michael, R.: Tired of wake words? Moving towards seamless conversations with intelligent personal assistants. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, pp. 1–3 (2020)
  2. Nick, Z.: Sensory Evaluation of Sound. CRC Press (2018)

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Cackett, M., Fulton, L., & Pearl, D.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
  • Cackett, Megan
  • Fulton, Laura
  • Pearl, David
Venue
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
Published
2022-10-13
Pages
120-129
ISSN
  • 2367-3370 (ISSN-L)
  • 2367-3389
OpenAlex
W4304633842
Cited by
3
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Lecture notes in networks and systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
voice user interface, virtual assistants, background noise, usability evaluation, user experience, natural language processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sound as an Interface, Methods to Evaluate Voice User Interface (VUI) Experiences in Various Contexts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-031-18458-1_9
The paper
Cackett, M., Fulton, L., & Pearl, D. (2023). Sound as an Interface, Methods to Evaluate Voice User Interface (VUI) Experiences in Various Contexts. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18458-1_9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.