Cited by 18Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Financial Distress and Bankruptcy PredictionImbalanced Data Classification Techniques

A Systematic Review of Machine Learning and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Credit Risk Modelling

Heng, Yi Sheng, Subramanian, Preethi·2023·Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-18461-1_39

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heng, Y. S., & Subramanian, P.
Affiliations
Asia Pacific University of Technology & Innovation (MY)
Corresponding author
Heng, Yi Sheng
Venue
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
Published
2022-10-13
Pages
596-614
ISSN
  • 2367-3370 (ISSN-L)
  • 2367-3389
OpenAlex
W4304789250
Cited by
18
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.80
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in networks and systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Keywords
credit risk modeling, explainable AI, machine learning, model interpretability, black-box models, regulatory compliance, algorithmic bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review