Cited by 213Human Pose and Action RecognitionMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Frozen CLIP Models are Efficient Video Learners

Open access
Lin, Ziyi, Geng, Shijie, Zhang, Renrui, Gao, Peng, de Melo, Gerard, Wang, Xiaogang, Dai, Jifeng, Qiao, Yu +1 more·2022·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-19833-5_23

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our framework significantly outperforms previous adaptation methods across all datasets.

    “The experiment reveals our approach significantly outperforms previous adaptation methods across all datasets.”

    From Towards More General Video-based Deepfake Detection through Facial Component Guided Adaptation for Foundation Model (2024) · cites this paper as [29]

    Section 4.1 (p. 8) says the paper’s method achieves higher accuracy than earlier CLIP-based video methods, and Section 4.2 (p. 10) reports an advantage over full-finetuning baselines with CLIP backbones. The paper does not establish that the citing authors’ approach significantly outperforms previous adaptation methods across all datasets; it also reports that its own method lags behind full finetuning with ImageNet-21k backbones. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Our framework requires significantly fewer trainable parameters compared to EVL, being approximately 200 times smaller.

    “Furthermore, our framework requires significantly fewer trainable parameters compared to EVL, being ≈ 200 times smaller.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. [1]1. Arnab, A., Dehghani, M., Heigold, G., Sun, C., Luˇ ci´ c, M., Schmid, C.: Vivit: A video vision transformer. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 6836-6846 (2021)
  2. [2]2. Bao, H., Dong, L., Wei, F.: Beit: Bert pre-training of image transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.08254 (2021) · arXiv
  3. [3]3. Bertasius, G., Wang, H., Torresani, L.: Is space-time attention all you need for video understanding? In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2021)
  4. [4]4. Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J.D., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al.: Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems 33 , 1877-1901 (2020)
  5. [6]6. Cheng, X., Lin, H., Wu, X., Yang, F., Shen, D.: Improving video-text retrieval by multi-stream corpus alignment and dual softmax loss. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.04290 (2021) · arXiv
  6. [7]7. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: NAACL-HLT (2019)
  7. [8]8. Diba, A., Fayyaz, M., Sharma, V., Arzani, M.M., Yousefzadeh, R., Gall, J., Van Gool, L.: Spatio-temporal channel correlation networks for action classification. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). pp. 284-299 (2018)
  8. [9]9. Duan, H., Zhao, Y., Xiong, Y., Liu, W., Lin, D.: Omni-sourced webly-supervised learning for video recognition. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 670-688. Springer (2020)
  9. [11]11. Fang, H., Xiong, P., Xu, L., Chen, Y.: Clip2video: Mastering video-text retrieval via image clip. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.11097 (2021) · arXiv
  10. [12]12. Feichtenhofer, C.: X3d: Expanding architectures for efficient video recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 203-213 (2020)
  11. [15]15. Gao, P., Geng, S., Zhang, R., Ma, T., Fang, R., Zhang, Y., Li, H., Qiao, Y.: Clip-adapter: Better vision-language models with feature adapters. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.04544 (2021) · arXiv
  12. [16]16. Gao, Z., Liu, J., Chen, S., Chang, D., Zhang, H., Yuan, J.: Clip2tv: An empirical study on transformer-based methods for video-text retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.05610 (2021) · arXiv
  13. [17]17. Girdhar, R., Singh, M., Ravi, N., van der Maaten, L., Joulin, A., Misra, I.: Omnivore: A Single Model for Many Visual Modalities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08377 (2022) · arXiv
  14. [18]18. Gowda, S.N., Rohrbach, M., Sevilla-Lara, L.: Smart frame selection for action recognition. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 35, pp. 1451-1459 (2021)
  15. [22]22. Houlsby, N., Giurgiu, A., Jastrzebski, S., Morrone, B., De Laroussilhe, Q., Gesmundo, A., Attariyan, M., Gelly, S.: Parameter-efficient transfer learning for nlp. In: International Conference on Machine Learning. pp. 2790-2799. PMLR (2019)
  16. [24]24. Jia, C., Yang, Y., Xia, Y., Chen, Y.T., Parekh, Z., Pham, H., Le, Q.V., Sung, Y., Li, Z., Duerig, T.: Scaling up visual and vision-language representation learning with noisy text supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.05918 (2021) · arXiv
  17. [25]25. Ju, C., Han, T., Zheng, K., Zhang, Y., Xie, W.: Prompting visual-language models for efficient video understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.04478 (2021) · arXiv
  18. [26]26. Kuehne, H., Jhuang, H., Garrote, E., Poggio, T., Serre, T.: Hmdb: a large video database for human motion recognition. In: 2011 International conference on computer vision. pp. 2556-2563. IEEE (2011)
  19. [28]28. Li, K., Wang, Y., Gao, P., Song, G., Liu, Y., Li, H., Qiao, Y.: Uniformer: Unified transformer for efficient spatiotemporal representation learning. In: ICLR (2022)
  20. [30]30. Li, Y., Wu, C.Y., Fan, H., Mangalam, K., Xiong, B., Malik, J., Feichtenhofer, C.: Improved multiscale vision transformers for classification and detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.01526 (2021) · arXiv
  21. [31]31. Li, Y., Lu, Z., Xiong, X., Huang, J.: Perf-net: Pose empowered rgb-flow net. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. pp. 513-522 (2022)
  22. [32]32. Liu, Z., Ning, J., Cao, Y., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., Hu, H.: Video swin transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.13230 (2021) · arXiv
  23. [33]33. Patrick, M., Campbell, D., Asano, Y.M., Metze, I.M.F., Feichtenhofer, C., Vedaldi, A., Henriques, J.F.: Keeping your eye on the ball: Trajectory attention in video transformers. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2021)
  24. [34]34. Pfeiffer, J., Kamath, A., R¨ uckl´ e, A., Cho, K., Gurevych, I.: Adapterfusion: Nondestructive task composition for transfer learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.00247 (2020) · arXiv
  25. [35]35. Qiu, Z., Yao, T., Mei, T.: Learning spatio-temporal representation with pseudo3d residual networks. In: proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 5533-5541 (2017)
  26. [36]36. Radford, A., Kim, J.W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al.: Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.00020 (2021) · arXiv
  27. [37]37. Riquelme, C., Puigcerver, J., Mustafa, B., Neumann, M., Jenatton, R., Pinto, A.S., Keysers, D., Houlsby, N.: Scaling vision with sparse mixture of experts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.05974 (2021) · arXiv
  28. [38]38. Ryoo, M.S., Piergiovanni, A., Arnab, A., Dehghani, M., Angelova, A.: Tokenlearner: What can 8 learned tokens do for images and videos? arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.11297 (2021) · arXiv
  29. [39]39. Shridhar, M., Manuelli, L., Fox, D.: Cliport: What and where pathways for robotic manipulation. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) (2021)
  30. [40]40. Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A.: Two-stream convolutional networks for action recognition in videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.2199 (2014) · arXiv
  31. [41]41. Soomro, K., Zamir, A.R., Shah, M.: Ucf101: A dataset of 101 human actions classes from videos in the wild. arXiv preprint arXiv:1212.0402 (2012) · arXiv
  32. [43]43. Tran, D., Wang, H., Torresani, L., Feiszli, M.: Video classification with channelseparated convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 5552-5561 (2019)
  33. [44]44. Tran, D., Wang, H., Torresani, L., Ray, J., LeCun, Y., Paluri, M.: A closer look at spatiotemporal convolutions for action recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 6450-6459 (2018)
  34. [45]45. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, glyph[suppress] L., Polosukhin, I.: Attention is all you need. In: Advances in neural information processing systems. pp. 5998-6008 (2017)
  35. [46]46. Wang, L., Xiong, Y., Wang, Z., Qiao, Y., Lin, D., Tang, X., Van Gool, L.: Temporal segment networks: Towards good practices for deep action recognition. In: European conference on computer vision. pp. 20-36. Springer (2016)
  36. [47]47. Wang, M., Xing, J., Liu, Y.: Actionclip: A new paradigm for video action recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.08472 (2021) · arXiv
  37. [49]49. Wei, C., Fan, H., Xie, S., Wu, C.Y., Yuille, A., Feichtenhofer, C.: Masked feature prediction for self-supervised visual pre-training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.09133 (2021) · arXiv
  38. [50]50. Xie, S., Sun, C., Huang, J., Tu, Z., Murphy, K.: Rethinking spatiotemporal feature learning: Speed-accuracy trade-offs in video classification. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV). pp. 305-321 (2018)
  39. [51]51. Xie, Z., Zhang, Z., Cao, Y., Lin, Y., Bao, J., Yao, Z., Dai, Q., Hu, H.: Simmim: A simple framework for masked image modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.09886 (2021) · arXiv
  40. [53]53. Yuan, L., Chen, D., Chen, Y.L., Codella, N., Dai, X., Gao, J., Hu, H., Huang, X., Li, B., Li, C., et al.: Florence: A new foundation model for computer vision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.11432 (2021) · arXiv
  41. [54]54. Zhai, X., Kolesnikov, A., Houlsby, N., Beyer, L.: Scaling vision transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.04560 (2021) · arXiv
  42. [55]55. Zhai, X., Kolesnikov, A., Houlsby, N., Beyer, L.: Scaling vision transformers. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 12104-12113 (2022)
  43. [56]56. Zhang, B., Yu, J., Fifty, C., Han, W., Dai, A.M., Pang, R., Sha, F.: Co-training transformer with videos and images improves action recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.07175 (2021) · arXiv
  44. [57]57. Zhang, R., Fang, R., Gao, P., Zhang, W., Li, K., Dai, J., Qiao, Y., Li, H.: Tipadapter: Training-free clip-adapter for better vision-language modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.03930 (2021) · arXiv
  45. [58]58. Zhang, R., Guo, Z., Zhang, W., Li, K., Miao, X., Cui, B., Qiao, Y., Gao, P., Li, H.: Pointclip: Point cloud understanding by clip. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.02413 (2021) · arXiv
  46. [59]59. Zhou, B., Andonian, A., Oliva, A., Torralba, A.: Temporal relational reasoning in videos. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV). pp. 803-818 (2018)
  47. [60]60. Zhou, K., Yang, J., Loy, C.C., Liu, Z.: Learning to prompt for vision-language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.01134 (2021) · arXiv
  48. [61]61. Zhu, L., Tran, D., Sevilla-Lara, L., Yang, Y., Feiszli, M., Wang, H.: Faster recurrent networks for efficient video classification. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 34, pp. 13098-13105 (2020)
  49. [62]62. Zolfaghari, M., Singh, K., Brox, T.: Eco: Efficient convolutional network for online video understanding. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV). pp. 695-712 (2018)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, Z., Geng, S., Zhang, R., Gao, P., de Melo, G., Wang, X., Dai, J., Qiao, Y., & Li, H.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CN)
  • Sensetime (China) (CN)
Corresponding author
Gao, Peng
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2022
Pages
388-404
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W4312558481
Cited by
213
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 37
FWCI
16.17
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
video recognition, visual representation learning, memory-efficient training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review